From: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (Bjorn Andersson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: cmd-db: Fix compiler warnings
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180625232618.GD1860@tuxbook-pro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1+qs3f2cLPKPiMKR4L74dwpAkBcZPNVG4hk_nfx12Xqw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon 25 Jun 14:08 PDT 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:30:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> I generally don't like patches that add incorrect initializations to
> >> work around warnings like this.
> >
> > Correct me if I am wrong, but this just masks the warnings on toolchain/
> > platforms that exhibit these warnings. I'm not entirely fond of doing
> > blanket init either to make the warnings go away either...
>
> My patch disallows the case where the compiler can see that the variable
> is actually used without an initialization, and that code wouldn't
> work properly.
>
> The problem is that in this loop:
>
> for (i = 0; i < MAX_SLV_ID; i++) {
> rsc_hdr = &cmd_db_header->header[i];
> if (!rsc_hdr->slv_id)
> break;
>
> ent = rsc_to_entry_header(rsc_hdr);
> for (j = 0; j < le16_to_cpu(rsc_hdr->cnt); j++, ent++) {
> if (memcmp(ent->id, query, sizeof(ent->id)) == 0)
> break;
> }
>
> if (j < le16_to_cpu(rsc_hdr->cnt)) {
> memcpy(eh, ent, sizeof(*ent));
> memcpy(rh, rsc_hdr, sizeof(*rh));
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
> I think gcc sees that cmd_db_header is initialized to NULL and never
> written to after of_reserved_mem_lookup() returns NULL during
> cmd_db_dev_probe().
>
> This means we are that cmd_db_get_header never intializes the
> resulting structure. It also never returns zero, but gcc doesn't
> see that here.
>
The optimization that I can see would lead to a difference here is if
the conditional in cmd_db_read() is just removed as the compiler see it
always being true, but then doesn't propagate this to the error handling
in cmd_db_get_header(); but that wouldn't make much sense...
Otherwise I think cmd_db_header would be equally uninitialized in the
case where CONFIG_OF_RESERVED_MEM is set, but we haven't seen any issues
related to this on arm64.
Unless there's something I'm missing I would prefer that we just take
Anders' proposed fix, it does mask the problem in a more direct way.
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 17:05 [PATCH 1/2] soc: qcom: cmd-db: Fix incorrect errno checks Andy Gross
2018-06-25 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: cmd-db: Fix compiler warnings Andy Gross
2018-06-25 19:44 ` Andy Gross
2018-06-25 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-25 20:54 ` Andy Gross
2018-06-25 21:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-06-25 23:26 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2018-06-25 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: qcom: cmd-db: Fix incorrect errno checks Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180625232618.GD1860@tuxbook-pro \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox