[PATCH 0/4] Add Actions Semi S900 SPS support

[PATCH 0/4] Add Actions Semi S900 SPS support

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Add SPS (Smart Power System) support to Actions Semi S900 SoC.

Manivannan Sadhasivam (4):
  dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS
  arm64: dts: actions: Add S900 SPS node
  soc: actions: sps: Add S900 power domains
  soc: actions: Fix help text in Kconfig for OWL_PM_DOMAINS

 .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt  |  2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi              |  6 +++
 drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig                        |  2 +-
 drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c                      | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h     | 23 +++++++++
 5 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h

-- 
2.14.1

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Define power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC Smart Power System (SPS).

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt  |  2 ++
 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h     | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
index 78edd63641e8..a3571937b019 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ Actions Semi Owl Smart Power System (SPS)
 Required properties:
 - compatible          :  "actions,s500-sps" for S500
                          "actions,s700-sps" for S700
+                         "actions,s900-sps" for S900
 - reg                 :  Offset and length of the register set for the device.
 - #power-domain-cells :  Must be 1.
                          See macros in:
                           include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s500-powergate.h for S500
                           include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s700-powergate.h for S700
+                          include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h for S900
 
 
 Example:
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Actions Semi S900 SPS
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd.
+ */
+#ifndef DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
+#define DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
+
+#define S900_PD_GPU_B	0
+#define S900_PD_VCE	1
+#define S900_PD_SENSOR	2
+#define S900_PD_VDE	3
+#define S900_PD_HDE	4
+#define S900_PD_USB3	5
+#define S900_PD_DDR0	6
+#define S900_PD_DDR1	7
+#define S900_PD_DE	8
+#define S900_PD_NAND	9
+#define S900_PD_USB2_H0	10
+#define S900_PD_USB2_H1	11
+
+#endif
-- 
2.14.1

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:10:33PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Define power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC Smart Power System (SPS).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt  |  2 ++
>  include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h     | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Mani,

Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> Define power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC Smart Power System (SPS).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt  |  2 ++
>  include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h     | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> index 78edd63641e8..a3571937b019 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ Actions Semi Owl Smart Power System (SPS)
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible          :  "actions,s500-sps" for S500
>                           "actions,s700-sps" for S700
> +                         "actions,s900-sps" for S900
>  - reg                 :  Offset and length of the register set for the device.
>  - #power-domain-cells :  Must be 1.
>                           See macros in:
>                            include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s500-powergate.h for S500
>                            include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s700-powergate.h for S700
> +                          include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h for S900
>  
>  
>  Example:
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+

checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax
for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that
you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is
supposed to be dual-licensed.

Can you please give your consent to make this

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */

like my S500 and S700 bindings?

Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?

Otherwise looks fine, except that I'll need a topic branch
(v4.19/s900-sps-bindings) if we want to merge the driver portion at the
same time.

Regards,
Andreas

> +/*
> + * Actions Semi S900 SPS
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd.
> + */
> +#ifndef DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
> +#define DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
> +
> +#define S900_PD_GPU_B	0
> +#define S900_PD_VCE	1
> +#define S900_PD_SENSOR	2
> +#define S900_PD_VDE	3
> +#define S900_PD_HDE	4
> +#define S900_PD_USB3	5
> +#define S900_PD_DDR0	6
> +#define S900_PD_DDR1	7
> +#define S900_PD_DE	8
> +#define S900_PD_NAND	9
> +#define S900_PD_USB2_H0	10
> +#define S900_PD_USB2_H1	11
> +
> +#endif
> 


-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Hi Andreas,

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 03:04:21PM +0200, Andreas F?rber wrote:
> Hi Mani,
> 
> Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> > Define power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC Smart Power System (SPS).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt  |  2 ++
> >  include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h     | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> > index 78edd63641e8..a3571937b019 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/actions,owl-sps.txt
> > @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ Actions Semi Owl Smart Power System (SPS)
> >  Required properties:
> >  - compatible          :  "actions,s500-sps" for S500
> >                           "actions,s700-sps" for S700
> > +                         "actions,s900-sps" for S900
> >  - reg                 :  Offset and length of the register set for the device.
> >  - #power-domain-cells :  Must be 1.
> >                           See macros in:
> >                            include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s500-powergate.h for S500
> >                            include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s700-powergate.h for S700
> > +                          include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h for S900
> >  
> >  
> >  Example:
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> 
> checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax
> for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that
> you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is
> supposed to be dual-licensed.
> 
> Can you please give your consent to make this
> 
> /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
> 

You can change the license to GPL-2.0+ OR MIT.

> like my S500 and S700 bindings?
> 
> Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?
>

I think GPL-2.0+ is fine.

Thanks,
Mani

> Otherwise looks fine, except that I'll need a topic branch
> (v4.19/s900-sps-bindings) if we want to merge the driver portion at the
> same time.
> 
> Regards,
> Andreas
> 
> > +/*
> > + * Actions Semi S900 SPS
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Linaro Ltd.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
> > +#define DT_BINDINGS_POWER_OWL_S900_POWERGATE_H
> > +
> > +#define S900_PD_GPU_B	0
> > +#define S900_PD_VCE	1
> > +#define S900_PD_SENSOR	2
> > +#define S900_PD_VDE	3
> > +#define S900_PD_HDE	4
> > +#define S900_PD_USB3	5
> > +#define S900_PD_DDR0	6
> > +#define S900_PD_DDR1	7
> > +#define S900_PD_DE	8
> > +#define S900_PD_NAND	9
> > +#define S900_PD_USB2_H0	10
> > +#define S900_PD_USB2_H1	11
> > +
> > +#endif
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
> GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Daniel Thompson]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:11:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > 
> > checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax
> > for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that
> > you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is
> > supposed to be dual-licensed.
> > 
> > Can you please give your consent to make this
> > 
> > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
> > 
> 
> You can change the license to GPL-2.0+ OR MIT.
> 
> > like my S500 and S700 bindings?
> > 
> > Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?
> >
> 
> I think GPL-2.0+ is fine.

So... when I saw this I did wonder why one would knowly choose to use a
deprecated license identifier (https://spdx.org/licenses/ ).

However running `git diff v4.17..v4.18-rc1` through some filters does
indicate that GPL-2.0+ is the more popular choice by 256 to 0! Doesn't
mean you couldn't break the mould though ;-).


Daniel.

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Andreas Färber]

Am 27.06.2018 um 16:57 schrieb Daniel Thompson:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:11:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>> Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?
>>
>> I think GPL-2.0+ is fine.
> 
> So... when I saw this I did wonder why one would knowly choose to use a
> deprecated license identifier (https://spdx.org/licenses/ ).
> 
> However running `git diff v4.17..v4.18-rc1` through some filters does
> indicate that GPL-2.0+ is the more popular choice by 256 to 0! Doesn't
> mean you couldn't break the mould though ;-).

The kernel.org documentation does not mention the new ones yet.

I checked under LICENSES/ - preferred/GPL-2.0.txt actually lists both
identifiers, and checkpatch.pl did not complain about either.

So for my personal patches I'll be going with the new identifier, unless
I hear of reasons not to.

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: power: Add Actions Semi S900 SPS

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:57:13PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:11:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..f1aaf761112b
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > 
> > > checkpatch.pl warns about this line due to not using /* ... */ syntax
> > > for headers. I could fix that up on my own, but it made me realize that
> > > you are licensing this file under GPL-2.0+ only, whereas the .dts[i] is
> > > supposed to be dual-licensed.
> > > 
> > > Can you please give your consent to make this
> > > 
> > > /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */
> > > 
> > 
> > You can change the license to GPL-2.0+ OR MIT.
> > 
> > > like my S500 and S700 bindings?
> > > 
> > > Question: Should it still be GPL-2.0+ or the new GPL-2.0-or-later?
> > >
> > 
> > I think GPL-2.0+ is fine.
> 
> So... when I saw this I did wonder why one would knowly choose to use a
> deprecated license identifier (https://spdx.org/licenses/ ).
> 
> However running `git diff v4.17..v4.18-rc1` through some filters does
> indicate that GPL-2.0+ is the more popular choice by 256 to 0! Doesn't
> mean you couldn't break the mould though ;-).
>

I did grep through the source and hit with same numbers ;-) But I was not
sure whether to break the mould or not, so chose the safest path :)

Since you already gave the green signal, I think we can move to new style
identifier.

Thanks,
Mani 
> 
> Daniel.

[PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: actions: Add S900 SPS node

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Add Actions Semi S900 Smart Power System (SPS) node

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi
index 11406f6d3a6d..0b29dbe0030e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi
@@ -154,6 +154,12 @@
 			status = "disabled";
 		};
 
+		sps: power-controller at e012e000 {
+			compatible = "actions,s900-sps";
+			reg = <0x0 0xe012e000 0x0 0x2000>;
+			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
+		};
+
 		timer: timer at e0228000 {
 			compatible = "actions,s900-timer";
 			reg = <0x0 0xe0228000 0x0 0x8000>;
-- 
2.14.1

[PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: actions: Add S900 SPS node

[Andreas Färber]

Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> Add Actions Semi S900 Smart Power System (SPS) node
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/actions/s900.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>

(Depends on preceding bindings patch.)

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH 3/4] soc: actions: sps: Add S900 power domains

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Add power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c b/drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c
index 38b276e6f319..f6445d671f22 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/soc/actions/owl-sps.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/power/owl-s500-powergate.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/power/owl-s700-powergate.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/power/owl-s900-powergate.h>
 
 struct owl_sps_domain_info {
 	const char *name;
@@ -240,9 +241,66 @@ static const struct owl_sps_info s700_sps_info = {
 	.domains = s700_sps_domains,
 };
 
+static const struct owl_sps_domain_info s900_sps_domains[] = {
+	[S900_PD_GPU_B] = {
+		.name = "GPU_B",
+		.pwr_bit = 3,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_VCE] = {
+		.name = "VCE",
+		.pwr_bit = 4,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_SENSOR] = {
+		.name = "SENSOR",
+		.pwr_bit = 5,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_VDE] = {
+		.name = "VDE",
+		.pwr_bit = 6,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_HDE] = {
+		.name = "HDE",
+		.pwr_bit = 7,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_USB3] = {
+		.name = "USB3",
+		.pwr_bit = 8,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_DDR0] = {
+		.name = "DDR0",
+		.pwr_bit = 9,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_DDR1] = {
+		.name = "DDR1",
+		.pwr_bit = 10,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_DE] = {
+		.name = "DE",
+		.pwr_bit = 13,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_NAND] = {
+		.name = "NAND",
+		.pwr_bit = 14,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_USB2_H0] = {
+		.name = "USB2_H0",
+		.pwr_bit = 15,
+	},
+	[S900_PD_USB2_H1] = {
+		.name = "USB2_H1",
+		.pwr_bit = 16,
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct owl_sps_info s900_sps_info = {
+	.num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(s900_sps_domains),
+	.domains = s900_sps_domains,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id owl_sps_of_matches[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "actions,s500-sps", .data = &s500_sps_info },
 	{ .compatible = "actions,s700-sps", .data = &s700_sps_info },
+	{ .compatible = "actions,s900-sps", .data = &s900_sps_info },
 	{ }
 };
 
-- 
2.14.1

[PATCH 3/4] soc: actions: sps: Add S900 power domains

[Andreas Färber]

Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> Add power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>

(Depends on bindings patch.)

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH 3/4] soc: actions: sps: Add S900 power domains

[Andreas Färber]

Am 24.06.18 um 15:07 schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
>> Add power domains for Actions Semi S900 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/actions/owl-sps.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>

Series merged now via topic branch.

Thanks,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH 4/4] soc: actions: Fix help text in Kconfig for OWL_PM_DOMAINS

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

OWL_PM_DOMAINS is being used by 3 SoCs of OWL family. This fixes
the wording to use family name OWL instead of SoC name S500.

Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
index 9d68b5a771c3..26c3155d3738 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ config OWL_PM_DOMAINS
 	select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
 	help
 	  Say 'y' here to enable support for Smart Power System (SPS)
-	  power-gating on Actions Semiconductor S500 SoC.
+	  power-gating on Actions Semiconductor OWL SoCs.
 	  If unsure, say 'n'.
 
 endif
-- 
2.14.1

[PATCH 4/4] soc: actions: Fix help text in Kconfig for OWL_PM_DOMAINS

[Andreas Färber]

Hi Mani,

Am 11.04.2018 um 18:40 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> OWL_PM_DOMAINS is being used by 3 SoCs of OWL family. This fixes
> the wording to use family name OWL instead of SoC name S500.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
> index 9d68b5a771c3..26c3155d3738 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ config OWL_PM_DOMAINS
>  	select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
>  	help
>  	  Say 'y' here to enable support for Smart Power System (SPS)
> -	  power-gating on Actions Semiconductor S500 SoC.
> +	  power-gating on Actions Semiconductor OWL SoCs.

Thanks for spotting this. However, repeating OWL from the title (which I
think should be spelled Owl in free text, given that I also read Falcon
as another bird for GT9 [*]) does not seem too helpful for people
wondering whether or not to enable the driver.

I would much rather do a patch updating this to "S500 and S700 SoCs"
with Fixes and then just add S900 as part of your preceding patch.

Regards,
Andreas

[*] https://androidpc.es/blog/2015/11/10/actions-gt7/

>  	  If unsure, say 'n'.
>  
>  endif
> 


-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)

[PATCH] soc: actions: Update SPS help text for S700

[Andreas Färber]

Commit 3ad85b08f7789d51e6aad0f535296d1c31e319b9 (soc: actions: sps: Add S700)
added S700 support to the SPS driver but forget to update Kconfig help.

Add missing S700 mention, in preparation for further SoCs.

Fixes: 3ad85b08f778 ("soc: actions: sps: Add S700")
Reported-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
---
 drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
index 9d68b5a771c3..56064f8859a0 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ config OWL_PM_DOMAINS
 	select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
 	help
 	  Say 'y' here to enable support for Smart Power System (SPS)
-	  power-gating on Actions Semiconductor S500 SoC.
+	  power-gating on Actions Semiconductor S500 and S700 SoCs.
 	  If unsure, say 'n'.
 
 endif
-- 
2.16.4

[PATCH] soc: actions: Update SPS help text for S700

[Andreas Färber]

Am 24.06.18 um 16:01 schrieb Andreas F?rber:
> Commit 3ad85b08f7789d51e6aad0f535296d1c31e319b9 (soc: actions: sps: Add S700)
> added S700 support to the SPS driver but forget to update Kconfig help.
> 
> Add missing S700 mention, in preparation for further SoCs.
> 
> Fixes: 3ad85b08f778 ("soc: actions: sps: Add S700")
> Reported-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas F?rber <afaerber@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/actions/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied to v4.20/drivers branch.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)