From: peterz@infradead.org (Peter Zijlstra)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] x86/kernel: jump_table: use relative references
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:28:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180628092815.GD2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9oxJCvpxRKpkndci1RGuewBsAPQW9W1=uXU1boGTSRrQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:34:54AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 June 2018 at 10:31, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:06:04PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> Similar to the arm64 case, 64-bit x86 can benefit from using 32-bit
> >> relative references rather than 64-bit absolute ones when emitting
> >> struct jump_entry instances. Not only does this reduce the memory
> >> footprint of the entries themselves by 50%, it also removes the need
> >> for carrying relocation metadata on relocatable builds (i.e., for KASLR)
> >> which saves a fair chunk of .init space as well (although the savings
> >> are not as dramatic as on arm64)
> >
> > This will conflict with:
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622172212.199633-10-namit at vmware.com
>
> Thanks for the head's up. Fortunately, it does not conflict
> fundamentally, so it should be a straight-forward rebase after that
> code is merged.
Yeah, shouldn't be hard to cure.
There's another patch set that might have a little conflict, but that's
not near ready I think, so that'll have to just cope with things
shifting underneath (and there too, the fixup shouldn't be hard).
> Do you think this is likely to get merged for v4.19?
I'm thinking it is near ready so it might, but I'm not in charge of
those bits :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-27 16:05 [PATCH 0/5] add support for relative references in jump tables Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] kernel/jump_label: abstract jump_entry member accessors Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 2/5] kernel/jump_label: implement generic support for relative references Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 9:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 9:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 9:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 3/5] arm64/kernel: jump_label: switch to " Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 9:17 ` Will Deacon
2018-06-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: jump_label: switch to jump_entry accessors Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/kernel: jump_table: use relative references Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 8:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-28 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180628092815.GD2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).