From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:09:53 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx51: Fix USB PHY duplicate unit-address In-Reply-To: <1530211296-24591-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> References: <1530211296-24591-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20180703060951.GF4348@dragon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:41:36PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > Currently the following DTC warnings are seen with W=1: > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-babbage.dtb: Warning (unique_unit_address): /usbphy/usbphy at 0: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /usbphy/usbh1phy at 0) > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-mbimxsd51-baseboard.dtb: Warning (unique_unit_address): /usbphy/usbphy at 0: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /usbphy/usbh1phy at 0) > > Fix it by moving the USB PHY nodes outside of simple-bus and drop the > unneeded unit-address, which matches the bindings documentation > at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-nop-xceiv.txt > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > Changes since v1: > - Make it a single patch including the imx51.dtsi change (Shawn) > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-babbage.dts | 21 +++++++-------------- > .../boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-mbimxsd51-baseboard.dts | 19 ++++++------------- > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi | 17 +++++------------ > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-babbage.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-babbage.dts > index b8ca73d..de46906 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-babbage.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-babbage.dts > @@ -170,20 +170,13 @@ > mux-ext-port = <3>; > }; > > - usbphy { > - #address-cells = <1>; > - #size-cells = <0>; > - compatible = "simple-bus"; > - > - usbh1phy: usbh1phy at 0 { > - compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; > - reg = <0>; > - clocks = <&clk_usb>; > - clock-names = "main_clk"; > - reset-gpios = <&gpio2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > - vcc-supply = <&vusb_reg>; > - #phy-cells = <0>; > - }; > + usbh1phy: usbh1phy1 { usbh1phy1 ... > + compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; > + clocks = <&clk_usb>; > + clock-names = "main_clk"; > + reset-gpios = <&gpio2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + vcc-supply = <&vusb_reg>; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > }; > }; > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-mbimxsd51-baseboard.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-mbimxsd51-baseboard.dts > index b3d952f..2320464 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-mbimxsd51-baseboard.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51-eukrea-mbimxsd51-baseboard.dts > @@ -83,19 +83,12 @@ > fsl,mux-ext-port = <3>; > }; > > - usbphy { > - #address-cells = <1>; > - #size-cells = <0>; > - compatible = "simple-bus"; > - > - usbh1phy: usbh1phy at 0 { > - compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; > - reg = <0>; > - clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_USB_PHY_GATE>; > - clock-names = "main_clk"; > - clock-frequency = <19200000>; > - #phy-cells = <0>; > - }; > + usbh1phy: usbh1phy { ... usbh1phy? Can we name the usbphy nodes a bit more consistent? I would even suggest to name them in the same way as usbphy0 in i.mx51.dtsi. That said, usbphy1 should just work? Shawn > + compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; > + clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_USB_PHY_GATE>; > + clock-names = "main_clk"; > + clock-frequency = <19200000>; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > }; > }; > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi > index fe01b89..89520c1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi > @@ -93,18 +93,11 @@ > }; > }; > > - usbphy { > - #address-cells = <1>; > - #size-cells = <0>; > - compatible = "simple-bus"; > - > - usbphy0: usbphy at 0 { > - compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; > - reg = <0>; > - clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_USB_PHY_GATE>; > - clock-names = "main_clk"; > - #phy-cells = <0>; > - }; > + usbphy0: usbphy0 { > + compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; > + clocks = <&clks IMX5_CLK_USB_PHY_GATE>; > + clock-names = "main_clk"; > + #phy-cells = <0>; > }; > > display-subsystem { > -- > 2.7.4 >