From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:21:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] clk: meson: add sub EMMC clock dt-bindings IDs In-Reply-To: <20180703145716.31860-3-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> References: <20180703145716.31860-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20180703145716.31860-3-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> Message-ID: <20180703092107.51497a8f@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:57:15 +0000 Yixun Lan wrote: > Add two clock bindings IDs which provided by the EMMC clock controller, > These two clocks will be used by EMMC or NAND driver. > > Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan > --- > include/dt-bindings/clock/emmc-clkc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/emmc-clkc.h > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/emmc-clkc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/emmc-clkc.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..d9972c400e58 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/emmc-clkc.h > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT) */ > +/* > + * Meson EMMC sub clock tree IDs > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2018 Amlogic, Inc. All rights reserved. > + */ > + > +#ifndef __EMMC_CLKC_H > +#define __EMMC_CLKC_H > + > +#define CLKID_EMMC_C_MUX 0 Looks like the MUX clk is the parent of the DIV one, and I guess the clk driver is able to select the best parent+div pair for a requested rate. Do you really need to expose the MUX to users? > +#define CLKID_EMMC_C_DIV 1 > + > +#endif