From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: add fractional divisor support
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:22:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180703102257.678db6a8@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59b14f97234271a7d859fa07f27bd66ec252ccc9.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:51:03 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 13:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 18:04 +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > For Synopsys DesignWare 8250 uart which version >= 4.00a, there's a
> > > valid divisor latch fraction register. The fractional divisor width
> > > is
> > > 4bits ~ 6bits.
> > >
> >
> > There are several serial IPs that have fractional divider built-in.
> > None
> > is using any specific hooks. Why do you need in your case, esp. taking
> > into consideration that we have a custom ->set_termios() callback?
>
> Okay, I see that in 8250 we have hooks embedded into 8250_port.c which
> is not the best solution.
>
> For example it prevents better splitting Exar code.
> So, we would need these hooks, but better to integrate them in the same
> way like it's done for the rest of 8250 ones, i.e.
> - rename existing to have a "do" word
> - create new functions which would be a replacement that choose between
> "do" variant and custom one
> - not sure if we need to export "do" variants (at least for now)
So you mean add the support as following:
1.rename current serial8250_set_divisor as serial8250_do_set_divisor
2.add a new serial8250_set_divisor which will be as simple as
static void serial8250_set_divisor(struct uart_port *port, ...)
{
struct uart_8250_port *up = up_to_u8250p(port);
if (up->set_divisor)
up->set_divisor(...);
else
serial8250_do_set_divisor(...);
}
could you please confirm?
Another issue is I'm not sure which struct to add the hook,
struct uart_port or struct uart_8250_port? Currently, it seems that only
uart_8250_port needs this hook, sure, adding the hook to struct uart_port
is fine either. Could you please kindly give some suggestions?
Thanks,
Jisheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-03 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-02 10:04 [PATCH 0/2] serial: 8250_dw: add fractional divisor support Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] serial: 8250: introduce get_divisor() and set_divisor() hook Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-02 10:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] serial: 8250_dw: add fractional divisor support Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-02 10:18 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-02 11:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-03 2:22 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-07-03 2:48 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-03 13:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-03 13:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180703102257.678db6a8@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).