linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: oleg@redhat.com (Oleg Nesterov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 06/10] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore)
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 20:23:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180703182313.GA26120@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180703171255.GB23144@redhat.com>

forgot to mention...

Of course, I am not sure that UPROBE_KERN_CTR can actually work, there are a lot
of details. But if it can, then we can also make ->ref_ctr_offset a consumer property.

On 07/03, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 07/03, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> >
> > > OK, and how exactly they update the counter? I mean, can we assume that, say,
> > > bcc or systemtap can only increment or decrement it?
> >
> > I don't think we can assume anything here because this is all in user's
> > control. User can even manually go and update the counter by directly
> > hooking into the memory.
>
> Then how this all can work? I understand that user-space can do anything with
> this counter, but we do not care if it does something wrong, say nullifies the
> ctr incremented by kernel.
>
> I don't understand this. I think that if a user registers uprobe with
> ->ref_ctr_offset != 0 we can safely assume that this is a counter, and we do
> not care if userspace corrupts it.
>
> > > If yes, perhaps we can simplify the kernel code...
> >
> > Sure, let me know if you have any better idea.
>
> Can't we (ab)use the most significant bit in this counter?
>
> To simplify, lets suppose for the moment that 2 different uprobes can't have
> the same ->ref_ctr_offset. Then we can do something like
>
> 	#define UPROBE_KERN_CTR		(SHRT_MAX + 1)	// MSB
>
> 	install_breakpoint:
>
> 		for (each valid_ref_ctr_vma which maps uprobe->ref_ctr_offset)
> 			*ctr_ptr |= UPROBE_KERN_CTR;
>
> 		set_swbp();
>
> and
>
> 	remove_breakpoint:
>
> 		for (each valid_ref_ctr_vma which maps uprobe->ref_ctr_offset)
> 			*ctr_ptr &= ~UPROBE_KERN_CTR;
>
> 		set_orig_insn();
>
> IOW, we increment/decrement by UPROBE_KERN_CTR, not by 1. But this way the
> "increment" is idempotent, we do not care if "|=" or "&=" was applied more than
> once, we do not need to record the fact that the counter was already incremented,
> and inc/dec are always balanced.
>
>
> Now, lets recall that multiple uprobes can share the same counter. install_breakpoint()
> is still fine, and we only need to add the additional code into remove_breakpoint:
>
> 		for (each uprobe with the same inode and ref_ctr_offset)
> 			if (filter_chain(uprobe))
> 				goto keep_ctr;
>
> 		for (each valid_ref_ctr_vma which maps uprobe->ref_ctr_offset)
> 			*ctr_ptr &= ~UPROBE_KERN_CTR;
>
> 	keep_ctr:
> 		set_orig_insn();
>
>
> Just an idea.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Oleg.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-03 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-28  5:21 [PATCH v5 00/10] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] Uprobes: Move uprobe structure to uprobe.h Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] Uprobes: Simplify uprobe_register() body Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] Uprobe: Change set_swbp definition Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] Uprobe: Change set_orig_insn definition Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] Uprobe: Change uprobe_write_opcode definition Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28 19:51   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-29  3:23     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-01 21:09   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-02  5:16     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-02 18:01       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-03  5:30         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-03  6:16           ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-03  7:43             ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-04  9:16               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-04  9:24                 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-03  8:11           ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-03 16:36           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-03 17:25             ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-04  4:53               ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-10 15:25                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-11  8:44                   ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-11  9:52                     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-12 14:58                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-12 19:53                       ` Song Liu
2018-07-13  7:55                         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-13 23:50                           ` Song Liu
2018-07-16  8:20                             ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-16  8:51                             ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-13  5:39                       ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-04  4:49             ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-03 17:12           ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-03 18:23             ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2018-07-04  5:25               ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-02 16:01   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-02 18:05     ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-03  6:29     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-03 19:26       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-07-04  5:26         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-04  6:07     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] trace_uprobe/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] Uprobes/sdt: " Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] Uprobes/sdt: Document about reference counter Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-02 14:54   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-03  7:50     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-06-28  5:22 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] perf probe: Support SDT markers having reference counter (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-02 14:45   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-02 14:57   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-07-03  8:00     ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180703182313.GA26120@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).