linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com (Sergey Senozhatsky)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix for restoring console loglevel after handling traps
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:40:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720064027.GA3901@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720062609.2haxhf23zyouoxmh@salmiak>

On (07/20/18 07:26), Mark Rutland wrote:
> > >
> > This die() is called from so many places i.e. entry.S shows so many ways i.e
> > el1_sync_invalid,irq,fiq_invalid,error_invalid.

[..]

> Indeed, but *none* of these should fire unless something has gone wrong already.

[..]

Agreed.

I see that all those arm64/kernel/entry.S el0_sync_invalid,
el0_irq_invalid, el0_fiq_invalid, and so on, invoke inv_entry macro
which calls into bad_mode, which ends up in panic() anyway:

asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
{
	console_verbose();

	pr_crit("Bad mode in %s handler detected on CPU%d, code 0x%08x -- %s\n",
		handler[reason], smp_processor_id(), esr,
		esr_get_class_string(esr));

	die("Oops - bad mode", regs, 0);
	local_daif_mask();
	panic("bad mode");
}

bad_mode is always fatal.

When the kernel becomes suicidal and wants to die() we better have
verbose consoles. So, no, I don't think I'm buying the patch.

	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-20  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-19  9:48 [PATCH] arm64: fix for restoring console loglevel after handling traps Hari Vyas
2018-07-19  9:48 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-19 10:01   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-19 10:17     ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-19 10:39       ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-19 14:12         ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20  6:26           ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20  6:40             ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-07-20  7:31               ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20  9:44                 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20 10:57                   ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20 11:22                     ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20 12:13           ` Petr Mladek
2018-07-20 13:34             ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-24  9:14               ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-24  9:48                 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-25 11:13                   ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20  9:28 ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180720064027.GA3901@jagdpanzerIV \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).