From: sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com (Sergey Senozhatsky)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix for restoring console loglevel after handling traps
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:40:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180720064027.GA3901@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720062609.2haxhf23zyouoxmh@salmiak>
On (07/20/18 07:26), Mark Rutland wrote:
> > >
> > This die() is called from so many places i.e. entry.S shows so many ways i.e
> > el1_sync_invalid,irq,fiq_invalid,error_invalid.
[..]
> Indeed, but *none* of these should fire unless something has gone wrong already.
[..]
Agreed.
I see that all those arm64/kernel/entry.S el0_sync_invalid,
el0_irq_invalid, el0_fiq_invalid, and so on, invoke inv_entry macro
which calls into bad_mode, which ends up in panic() anyway:
asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
{
console_verbose();
pr_crit("Bad mode in %s handler detected on CPU%d, code 0x%08x -- %s\n",
handler[reason], smp_processor_id(), esr,
esr_get_class_string(esr));
die("Oops - bad mode", regs, 0);
local_daif_mask();
panic("bad mode");
}
bad_mode is always fatal.
When the kernel becomes suicidal and wants to die() we better have
verbose consoles. So, no, I don't think I'm buying the patch.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-20 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-19 9:48 [PATCH] arm64: fix for restoring console loglevel after handling traps Hari Vyas
2018-07-19 9:48 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-19 10:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-19 10:17 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-19 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-19 14:12 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20 6:26 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20 6:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2018-07-20 7:31 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20 9:44 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20 10:57 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20 11:22 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-20 12:13 ` Petr Mladek
2018-07-20 13:34 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-24 9:14 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-24 9:48 ` Mark Rutland
2018-07-25 11:13 ` Hari Vyas
2018-07-20 9:28 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180720064027.GA3901@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).