From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 00:18:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] i2c: davinci: Avoid zero value of CLKH In-Reply-To: <0c29ccf5-4077-47a2-e7e0-c89ffcf8cb0b@ti.com> References: <20180713152017.2207-1-alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com> <0c29ccf5-4077-47a2-e7e0-c89ffcf8cb0b@ti.com> Message-ID: <20180720221810.67tcrphiu5xuudam@ninjato> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:43:46PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > > On 07/17/2018 06:57 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > > On Friday 13 July 2018 08:50 PM, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > > > If CLKH is set to 0 I2C clock is not generated at all, so avoid this value > > > and stretch the clock in this case. > > > > This must be by observation since specification does not seem to state > > this. > > It will be good to know (mention) on what hw was it observed? Some more info would also help me to decide if this is stable material or not. Is it a bug fix or more theoretical (but still valid, of course)? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: