linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/35] mtd: rawnand: davinci: convert driver to nand_scan()
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 08:44:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180721084408.1d32d5b7@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180720151527.16038-4-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

On Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:14:55 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Two helpers have been added to the core to make ECC-related
> configuration between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Use
> these hooks and convert the driver to just use nand_scan() instead of
> both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail().
> 
> Also change the unused "struct device *dev" parameter of the driver
> structure into a platform device to reuse it in the ->attach_chip()
> hook.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c
> index 626c9363e460..40145e206a6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/davinci_nand.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
>  struct davinci_nand_info {
>  	struct nand_chip	chip;
>  
> -	struct device		*dev;
> +	struct platform_device	*pdev;

For the record, there's a to_platform_device() macro you can use to get
a platform_device object from a device one, so this change was not
really needed. Actually, you should not even need a ->dev field here
because it can be retrieved from mtd->dev.parent. Anyway, if you
patched all places using davinci->dev to now use &davinci->pdev->dev
we should be good.

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>

>  
>  	bool			is_readmode;
>  
> @@ -605,6 +605,104 @@ static struct davinci_nand_pdata
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static int davinci_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> +	struct davinci_nand_info *info = to_davinci_nand(mtd);
> +	struct davinci_nand_pdata *pdata = nand_davinci_get_pdata(info->pdev);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (IS_ERR(pdata))
> +		return PTR_ERR(pdata);
> +
> +	switch (info->chip.ecc.mode) {
> +	case NAND_ECC_NONE:
> +		pdata->ecc_bits = 0;
> +		break;
> +	case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
> +		pdata->ecc_bits = 0;
> +		/*
> +		 * This driver expects Hamming based ECC when ecc_mode is set
> +		 * to NAND_ECC_SOFT. Force ecc.algo to NAND_ECC_HAMMING to
> +		 * avoid adding an extra ->ecc_algo field to
> +		 * davinci_nand_pdata.
> +		 */
> +		info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> +		break;
> +	case NAND_ECC_HW:
> +		if (pdata->ecc_bits == 4) {
> +			/*
> +			 * No sanity checks:  CPUs must support this,
> +			 * and the chips may not use NAND_BUSWIDTH_16.
> +			 */
> +
> +			/* No sharing 4-bit hardware between chipselects yet */
> +			spin_lock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
> +			if (ecc4_busy)
> +				ret = -EBUSY;
> +			else
> +				ecc4_busy = true;
> +			spin_unlock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
> +
> +			if (ret == -EBUSY)
> +				return ret;
> +
> +			info->chip.ecc.calculate = nand_davinci_calculate_4bit;
> +			info->chip.ecc.correct = nand_davinci_correct_4bit;
> +			info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_4bit;
> +			info->chip.ecc.bytes = 10;
> +			info->chip.ecc.options = NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK;
> +			info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
> +		} else {
> +			/* 1bit ecc hamming */
> +			info->chip.ecc.calculate = nand_davinci_calculate_1bit;
> +			info->chip.ecc.correct = nand_davinci_correct_1bit;
> +			info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_1bit;
> +			info->chip.ecc.bytes = 3;
> +			info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> +		}
> +		info->chip.ecc.size = 512;
> +		info->chip.ecc.strength = pdata->ecc_bits;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Update ECC layout if needed ... for 1-bit HW ECC, the default
> +	 * is OK, but it allocates 6 bytes when only 3 are needed (for
> +	 * each 512 bytes).  For the 4-bit HW ECC, that default is not
> +	 * usable:  10 bytes are needed, not 6.
> +	 */
> +	if (pdata->ecc_bits == 4) {
> +		int chunks = mtd->writesize / 512;
> +
> +		if (!chunks || mtd->oobsize < 16) {
> +			dev_dbg(&info->pdev->dev, "too small\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* For small page chips, preserve the manufacturer's
> +		 * badblock marking data ... and make sure a flash BBT
> +		 * table marker fits in the free bytes.
> +		 */
> +		if (chunks == 1) {
> +			mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &hwecc4_small_ooblayout_ops);
> +		} else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) {
> +			mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops);
> +			info->chip.ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST;
> +		} else {
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct nand_controller_ops davinci_nand_controller_ops = {
> +	.attach_chip = davinci_nand_attach_chip,
> +};
> +
>  static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct davinci_nand_pdata	*pdata;
> @@ -658,7 +756,7 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>  	}
>  
> -	info->dev		= &pdev->dev;
> +	info->pdev		= pdev;
>  	info->base		= base;
>  	info->vaddr		= vaddr;
>  
> @@ -708,97 +806,13 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
>  
>  	/* Scan to find existence of the device(s) */
> -	ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, pdata->mask_chipsel ? 2 : 1, NULL);
> +	info->chip.dummy_controller.ops = &davinci_nand_controller_ops;
> +	ret = nand_scan(mtd, pdata->mask_chipsel ? 2 : 1);
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "no NAND chip(s) found\n");
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	switch (info->chip.ecc.mode) {
> -	case NAND_ECC_NONE:
> -		pdata->ecc_bits = 0;
> -		break;
> -	case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
> -		pdata->ecc_bits = 0;
> -		/*
> -		 * This driver expects Hamming based ECC when ecc_mode is set
> -		 * to NAND_ECC_SOFT. Force ecc.algo to NAND_ECC_HAMMING to
> -		 * avoid adding an extra ->ecc_algo field to
> -		 * davinci_nand_pdata.
> -		 */
> -		info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> -		break;
> -	case NAND_ECC_HW:
> -		if (pdata->ecc_bits == 4) {
> -			/* No sanity checks:  CPUs must support this,
> -			 * and the chips may not use NAND_BUSWIDTH_16.
> -			 */
> -
> -			/* No sharing 4-bit hardware between chipselects yet */
> -			spin_lock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
> -			if (ecc4_busy)
> -				ret = -EBUSY;
> -			else
> -				ecc4_busy = true;
> -			spin_unlock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
> -
> -			if (ret == -EBUSY)
> -				return ret;
> -
> -			info->chip.ecc.calculate = nand_davinci_calculate_4bit;
> -			info->chip.ecc.correct = nand_davinci_correct_4bit;
> -			info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_4bit;
> -			info->chip.ecc.bytes = 10;
> -			info->chip.ecc.options = NAND_ECC_GENERIC_ERASED_CHECK;
> -			info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
> -		} else {
> -			/* 1bit ecc hamming */
> -			info->chip.ecc.calculate = nand_davinci_calculate_1bit;
> -			info->chip.ecc.correct = nand_davinci_correct_1bit;
> -			info->chip.ecc.hwctl = nand_davinci_hwctl_1bit;
> -			info->chip.ecc.bytes = 3;
> -			info->chip.ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_HAMMING;
> -		}
> -		info->chip.ecc.size = 512;
> -		info->chip.ecc.strength = pdata->ecc_bits;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Update ECC layout if needed ... for 1-bit HW ECC, the default
> -	 * is OK, but it allocates 6 bytes when only 3 are needed (for
> -	 * each 512 bytes).  For the 4-bit HW ECC, that default is not
> -	 * usable:  10 bytes are needed, not 6.
> -	 */
> -	if (pdata->ecc_bits == 4) {
> -		int	chunks = mtd->writesize / 512;
> -
> -		if (!chunks || mtd->oobsize < 16) {
> -			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "too small\n");
> -			ret = -EINVAL;
> -			goto err;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* For small page chips, preserve the manufacturer's
> -		 * badblock marking data ... and make sure a flash BBT
> -		 * table marker fits in the free bytes.
> -		 */
> -		if (chunks == 1) {
> -			mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &hwecc4_small_ooblayout_ops);
> -		} else if (chunks == 4 || chunks == 8) {
> -			mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &nand_ooblayout_lp_ops);
> -			info->chip.ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST;
> -		} else {
> -			ret = -EIO;
> -			goto err;
> -		}
> -	}
> -
> -	ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		goto err;
> -
>  	if (pdata->parts)
>  		ret = mtd_device_register(mtd, pdata->parts, pdata->nr_parts);
>  	else
> @@ -815,11 +829,6 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  err_cleanup_nand:
>  	nand_cleanup(&info->chip);
>  
> -err:
> -	spin_lock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
> -	if (info->chip.ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW_SYNDROME)
> -		ecc4_busy = false;
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&davinci_nand_lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-21  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-20 15:14 [PATCH v4 00/35] Allow dynamic allocations during NAND chip identification phase Miquel Raynal
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/35] mtd: rawnand: brcmnand: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:23   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/35] mtd: rawnand: cafe: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:35   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/35] mtd: rawnand: davinci: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:44   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/35] mtd: rawnand: denali: convert " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:46   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-25  9:42   ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-07-25  9:51     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-25 12:47       ` Miquel Raynal
2018-07-25 14:16         ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/35] mtd: rawnand: fsl_elbc: convert driver " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:50   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/35] mtd: rawnand: fsl_ifc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:53   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/35] mtd: rawnand: fsmc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:55   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 08/35] mtd: rawnand: gpmi: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:56   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 09/35] mtd: rawnand: hisi504: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21  6:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 10/35] mtd: rawnand: jz4780: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 15:23   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 11/35] mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_mlc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 15:26   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 12/35] mtd: rawnand: lpc32xx_slc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 15:27   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 13/35] mtd: rawnand: marvell: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 16:57   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 14/35] mtd: rawnand: mtk: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:10   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-26  6:06     ` xiaolei li
2018-07-26  6:14       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-26  6:46         ` xiaolei li
2018-07-26  6:49           ` Miquel Raynal
2018-07-26  6:53             ` xiaolei li
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 15/35] mtd: rawnand: mxc: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:19   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 16/35] mtd: rawnand: nandsim: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:21   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 17/35] mtd: rawnand: omap2: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:34   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 18/35] mtd: rawnand: s3c2410: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:38   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 19/35] mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: move all NAND chip related setup in one function Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:48   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 20/35] mtd: rawnand: sh_flctl: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 21/35] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:50   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 22/35] mtd: rawnand: tango: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:52   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 23/35] mtd: rawnand: txx9ndfmc: rename nand controller internal structure Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:53   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 24/35] mtd: rawnand: txx9ndfmc: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 17:54   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-21 18:04   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 25/35] mtd: rawnand: vf610: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-21 18:05   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-25  8:57   ` Stefan Agner
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 26/35] mtd: rawnand: atmel: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  6:40   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 27/35] mtd: rawnand: sm_common: convert driver to nand_scan_with_ids() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  6:44   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-26 19:06     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-26 23:13       ` Miquel Raynal
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 28/35] mtd: rawnand: allow exiting immediately nand_scan_ident() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  8:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 29/35] mtd: rawnand: docg4: convert driver to nand_scan() Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  8:52   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 30/35] mtd: rawnand: qcom: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  8:59   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 31/35] mtd: rawnand: jz4740: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  9:29   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 32/35] mtd: rawnand: tegra: " Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22  9:31   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 33/35] mtd: rawnand: do not export nand_scan_[ident|tail]() anymore Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22 10:30   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 34/35] mtd: rawnand: allocate model parameter dynamically Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22 10:32   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-20 15:15 ` [PATCH v4 35/35] mtd: rawnand: allocate dynamically ONFI parameters during detection Miquel Raynal
2018-07-22 10:35   ` Boris Brezillon
2018-07-26 23:34 ` [PATCH v4 00/35] Allow dynamic allocations during NAND chip identification phase Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180721084408.1d32d5b7@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).