[PATCH v4 02/20] virtio: pci-legacy: Validate queue pfn

[mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin)]

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 23/07/18 10:44, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 07/22/2018 04:53 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:18:45AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> >>> Legacy PCI over virtio uses a 32bit PFN for the queue. If the
> >>> queue pfn is too large to fit in 32bits, which we could hit on
> >>> arm64 systems with 52bit physical addresses (even with 64K page
> >>> size), we simply miss out a proper link to the other side of
> >>> the queue.
> >>>
> >>> Add a check to validate the PFN, rather than silently breaking
> >>> the devices.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> >>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org>
> >>> Cc: Peter Maydel <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> >>> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > 
> > 
> > Michael,
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> >>
> >> I assume this will be merged through some other tree.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > As such these two virtio patches do not have any code dependencies with
> > the rest of the series. So, if you could pick this up it should be fine.
> > Otherwise, may be Marc can push it with the rest of the series.
> > 
> > Marc,
> > 
> > Are you OK with that ?
> 
> Given that these two patches completely independent, I think their
> natural path should be the virtio tree. But if Michael doesn't want to
> pick them, I'll do it as part of this series.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.

It's ok, I can pick them up.

> -- 
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...