From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 10:49:59 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix ACPI dependencies In-Reply-To: References: <20180724093345.1575921-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20180724094406.GF19324@arm.com> Message-ID: <20180724094959.GH19324@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:46:23AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:37:10AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > How about something along the lines of what Ard suggested? Untested diff > > below. > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > index 303809c6..ec78d4d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ config ARM64 > > select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF > > select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS > > select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS > > + select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI > > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_MEMORY_FAILURE > > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW > > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128 if GCC_VERSION >= 50000 || CC_IS_CLANG > > I'd prefer Rafael's suggestion of just leaving out the architecture names from > the dependency, and making all three 'select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ACPI'. > > I'll send a v2. Ok, thanks. Will