From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] mm: workingset: tell cache transitions from workingset thrashing
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180724150448.GA25412@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180723162735.GA5980@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:27:35PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 05:35:35PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > index 1b18b4722420..72c9b6778b0a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > > @@ -611,11 +611,13 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_32 > TASK_SIZE_64);
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > > /*
> >
> > I tested it on two broken configurations, and found that you have
> > a typo here, it should be 'ifdef', not 'ifndef'. With that change, it
> > seems to build fine.
> >
> > Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Thanks for testing it, I don't have a cross-compile toolchain set up.
>
> ---
Thanks Arnd, Johannes. I can pick this up for -rc7 via the arm64 tree,
unless it's already queued elsewhere?
Will
> From 34c4c4549f09f971d2d391a8d652d56cb9b05475 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:18:23 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix vmemmap BUILD_BUG_ON() triggering on !vmemmap
> setups
>
> Arnd reports the following arm64 randconfig build error with the PSI
> patches that add another page flag:
>
> /git/arm-soc/arch/arm64/mm/init.c: In function 'mem_init':
> /git/arm-soc/include/linux/compiler.h:357:38: error: call to
> '__compiletime_assert_618' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON
> failed: sizeof(struct page) > (1 << STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT)
>
> The additional page flag causes other information stored in
> page->flags to get bumped into their own struct page member:
>
> #if SECTIONS_WIDTH+ZONES_WIDTH+NODES_SHIFT+LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT <=
> BITS_PER_LONG - NR_PAGEFLAGS
> #define LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT
> #else
> #define LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH 0
> #endif
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING) && LAST_CPUPID_WIDTH == 0
> #define LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> #endif
>
> which in turn causes the struct page size to exceed the size set in
> STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT. This value is an an estimate used to size the
> VMEMMAP page array according to address space and struct page size.
>
> However, the check is performed - and triggers here - on a !VMEMMAP
> config, which consumes an additional 22 page bits for the sparse
> section id. When VMEMMAP is enabled, those bits are returned, cpupid
> doesn't need its own member, and the page passes the VMEMMAP check.
>
> Restrict that check to the situation it was meant to check: that we
> are sizing the VMEMMAP page array correctly.
>
> Says Arnd:
>
> Further experiments show that the build error already existed before,
> but was only triggered with larger values of CONFIG_NR_CPU and/or
> CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT that might be used in actual configurations but
> not in randconfig builds.
>
> With longer CPU and node masks, I could recreate the problem with
> kernels as old as linux-4.7 when arm64 NUMA support got added.
>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 1a2db300348b ("arm64, numa: Add NUMA support for arm64 platforms.")
> Fixes: 3e1907d5bf5a ("arm64: mm: move vmemmap region right below the linear region")
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 1b18b4722420..86d9f9d303b0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -611,11 +611,13 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
> BUILD_BUG_ON(TASK_SIZE_32 > TASK_SIZE_64);
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> /*
> * Make sure we chose the upper bound of sizeof(struct page)
> - * correctly.
> + * correctly when sizing the VMEMMAP array.
> */
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct page) > (1 << STRUCT_PAGE_MAX_SHIFT));
> +#endif
>
> if (PAGE_SIZE >= 16384 && get_num_physpages() <= 128) {
> extern int sysctl_overcommit_memory;
> --
> 2.18.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-24 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180712172942.10094-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
[not found] ` <20180712172942.10094-3-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
2018-07-23 13:36 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: workingset: tell cache transitions from workingset thrashing Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-23 15:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-07-23 15:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-07-23 16:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-07-24 15:04 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-07-25 16:06 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180724150448.GA25412@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).