From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: manu@bidouilliste.com (Emmanuel Vadot) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:34:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: h5: Add SID for H5 In-Reply-To: <20180724130004.ynaiabshexrrbvo4@flea> References: <20180724101522.68165-1-manu@freebsd.org> <20180724101522.68165-5-manu@freebsd.org> <20180724130004.ynaiabshexrrbvo4@flea> Message-ID: <20180724153432.e398bddfe63e51e8dcebfc46@bidouilliste.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:00:04 +0200 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > The SID controller on H5 look the same as the one present in the A64. > > But in case we find some difference one day at a compatible string > > of it's own and a fallback to the A64 one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > index 62d646baac3c..28183bf77164 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > @@ -129,3 +129,8 @@ > > ; > > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-pinctrl"; > > }; > > + > > +&sid { > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid", > > + "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid"; > > +}; > > This is still a bit pointless, please remove the common node. You mean directly declare sid controller in the SoC dtsi and not have a common node in sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi ? > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- Emmanuel Vadot