From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin)
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:14:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/23] Add multi-channel support to Armada thermal
 driver
In-Reply-To: <1532570441.2358.27.camel@intel.com>
References: <20180716144206.30985-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
 <20180718172849.30b7cec0@xps13> <20180725095222.054f1e80@xps13>
 <1532570441.2358.27.camel@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20180726211442.GB3487@localhost.localdomain>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello,

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 10:00:41AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On ?, 2018-07-25 at 09:52 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Eduardo, Zhang,
> > 
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
> > 17:28:49 +0200:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Hi Eduardo,
> > > 
> > > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote on Mon, 16 Jul 2018
> > > 16:41:43 +0200:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The only capability of the Armada thermal driver is currently
> > > > just to
> > > > read one sensor (the default one) per AP and one per CP.
> > > > Actually,
> > > > there is one sensor per core in the AP806 plus one sensor in the
> > > > thermal IP itself. The CP110 just features one thermal sensor in
> > > > its
> > > > own thermal IP.
> > > > 
> > > > This series first improves the readability of this driver, then
> > > > adds
> > > > support for multi-channel thermal IPs. The bindings and the
> > > > device-trees are updated accordingly.
> > > > 
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Miqu?l??
> > > I know I sent this series on monday but there was almost no change
> > > on
> > > it (see below), do you think you will have the time to look at it
> > > before it's too late for the merge window?
> > I know a little bit what it is to be on the maintainer side of a
> > subsystem but these changes are laying since April, 21st and I really
> > expect to get them merged. Zhang, as Eduardo seems to be overloaded
> > this release, could you please take the series?
> > 
> > Of course if there are things to address I'll be happy to do so.
> > 
> I had a sync with Eduardo during last merge window, and we agreed to
> send separate git pull requests to Linus since this release and see how
> it works.
> This means that all the soc thermal driver patches should go to
> Eduardo' tree and then Linus' tree directly.
> 
> Anyway, let's ping Eduardo and see if he can review/take the patches.

Sorry fellows, but I was off camping in a place with no electricity/no
internet. I looked at this series before, and I do not remember anything
that could block it to go. Let me restart on working on it.

> 
> thanks,
> rui
> > Thanks,
> > Miqu?l