From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: manu@bidouilliste.com (Emmanuel Vadot) Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:56:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: allwinner: h5: Add SID for H5 In-Reply-To: <20180726115409.7hqtvx4rdqcqdjrq@flea> References: <20180724101522.68165-1-manu@freebsd.org> <20180724101522.68165-5-manu@freebsd.org> <20180724130004.ynaiabshexrrbvo4@flea> <20180724153432.e398bddfe63e51e8dcebfc46@bidouilliste.com> <20180724144218.jdvgrcqkz2kmohqx@flea> <20180724165501.d8f01bf20c7cc43e7ed7fc62@bidouilliste.com> <20180726115409.7hqtvx4rdqcqdjrq@flea> Message-ID: <20180727125654.ec813df71b492201aea2ca5f@bidouilliste.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 13:54:09 +0200 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 04:55:01PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:42:18 +0200 > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:00:04 +0200 > > > > Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > > > > > > The SID controller on H5 look the same as the one present in the A64. > > > > > > But in case we find some difference one day at a compatible string > > > > > > of it's own and a fallback to the A64 one. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot > > > > > > --- > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 5 +++++ > > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > > > > > index 62d646baac3c..28183bf77164 100644 > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi > > > > > > @@ -129,3 +129,8 @@ > > > > > > ; > > > > > > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-pinctrl"; > > > > > > }; > > > > > > + > > > > > > +&sid { > > > > > > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid", > > > > > > + "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid"; > > > > > > +}; > > > > > > > > > > This is still a bit pointless, please remove the common node. > > > > > > > > You mean directly declare sid controller in the SoC dtsi and not > > > > have a common node in sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi ? > > > > > > Yep > > > > The reason I've put it in the common file is because I'll send patches > > for the nvmem-cells needed for thermal, and those are common between > > the two. Other nvmem-cells are also common (like the chipid and > > probably other). > > Then we'll see what we can have in common and what not when we'll have > something in common? Will it make more sense that I just send a new series with nvmem-cells now along with thermal bindings ? > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com -- Emmanuel Vadot