linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com (Ravi Bangoria)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 5/6] trace_uprobe/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:21:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731035143.11942-6-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180731035143.11942-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>

We assume to have only one reference counter for one uprobe.
Don't allow user to add multiple trace_uprobe entries having
same inode+offset but different reference counter.

Ex,
  # echo "p:sdt_tick/loop2 /home/ravi/tick:0x6e4(0x10036)" > uprobe_events
  # echo "p:sdt_tick/loop2_1 /home/ravi/tick:0x6e4(0xfffff)" >> uprobe_events
  bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument

  # dmesg
  trace_kprobe: Reference counter offset mismatch.

There is one exception though:
When user is trying to replace the old entry with the new
one, we allow this if the new entry does not conflict with
any other existing entries.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index bf2be098eb08..be64d943d7ea 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -324,6 +324,35 @@ static int unregister_trace_uprobe(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Uprobe with multiple reference counter is not allowed. i.e.
+ * If inode and offset matches, reference counter offset *must*
+ * match as well. Though, there is one exception: If user is
+ * replacing old trace_uprobe with new one(same group/event),
+ * then we allow same uprobe with new reference counter as far
+ * as the new one does not conflict with any other existing
+ * ones.
+ */
+static struct trace_uprobe *find_old_trace_uprobe(struct trace_uprobe *new)
+{
+	struct trace_uprobe *tmp, *old = NULL;
+	struct inode *new_inode = d_real_inode(new->path.dentry);
+
+	old = find_probe_event(trace_event_name(&new->tp.call),
+				new->tp.call.class->system);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &uprobe_list, list) {
+		if ((old ? old != tmp : true) &&
+		    new_inode == d_real_inode(tmp->path.dentry) &&
+		    new->offset == tmp->offset &&
+		    new->ref_ctr_offset != tmp->ref_ctr_offset) {
+			pr_warn("Reference counter offset mismatch.");
+			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		}
+	}
+	return old;
+}
+
 /* Register a trace_uprobe and probe_event */
 static int register_trace_uprobe(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
 {
@@ -333,8 +362,12 @@ static int register_trace_uprobe(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
 	mutex_lock(&uprobe_lock);
 
 	/* register as an event */
-	old_tu = find_probe_event(trace_event_name(&tu->tp.call),
-			tu->tp.call.class->system);
+	old_tu = find_old_trace_uprobe(tu);
+	if (IS_ERR(old_tu)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(old_tu);
+		goto end;
+	}
+
 	if (old_tu) {
 		/* delete old event */
 		ret = unregister_trace_uprobe(old_tu);
-- 
2.14.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-31  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-31  3:51 [PATCH v7 0/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-31  3:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] Uprobes: Simplify uprobe_register() body Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-31  3:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] Uprobe: Additional argument arch_uprobe to uprobe_write_opcode() Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-31  3:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] Uprobes: Support SDT markers having reference count (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-03 11:24   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-06  9:52     ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-08-07 11:36       ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-07 12:33         ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-31  3:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] Uprobes/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe Ravi Bangoria
2018-07-31  3:51 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2018-07-31  3:51 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] perf probe: Support SDT markers having reference counter (semaphore) Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180731035143.11942-6-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).