From: vkoul@kernel.org (Vinod)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] dmaengine: Add metadat_ops for dma_async_tx_descriptor
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:59:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731042903.GC16775@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5112c28-a010-827b-c1fd-ecf00036412a@ti.com>
On 30-07-18, 12:46, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Vinod,
>
> On 2018-07-24 14:14, Vinod wrote:
> >>>> Clients must not mix the two way of handling the metadata.
> >>>> The set_len() is intended to tell the DMA driver the client provided
> >>>> metadata size (in MEM_TO_DEV case mostly).
> >>>>
> >>>> MEM_TO_DEV flow on client side:
> >>>> get_ptr()
> >>>> fill in the metadata to the pointer (not exceeding max_len)
> >>>> set_len() to tell the DMA driver the amount of valid bytes written
> >>>>
> >>>> DEV_TO_MEM flow on client side:
> >>>> In the completion callback, get_ptr()
> >>>> the metadata is payload_len bytes and can be accessed in the return pointer.
> >>>
> >>> I would think to unify this..
> >>
> >> I have tried it, but the attach mode and the pointer mode is hard to
> >> handle with a generic API.
> >> I will try to find a way to unify things in a sane way.
> >
> > Hmmm, looking from the description they will be for different methods,
> > so lets make them orthogonal and not allow driver to register both.
>
> I would allow DMA drivers to register both, but somehow enforce that
> clients are not mixing the two distinct way of dealing with the metadata.
>
> The reason for that is for example the attach mode is the simplest (I
> implemented it first and I have a client using it), but if the pointer
> mode is found to be more efficient and feasible for the DMA then the DMA
> driver can implement that mode and the client can move as well w/o
> breaking anything.
Sounds reasonable...
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-31 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-02 10:39 [RFC 0/6] Xilinx DMA enhancements and optimization Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-02 10:39 ` [RFC 1/6] dt-bindings: dma: xilinx_dma: Add optional property has_axieth_connected Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-11 9:05 ` Vinod Koul
2018-04-17 10:54 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-02 10:39 ` [RFC 2/6] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Pass AXI4-Stream control words to netdev dma client Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-11 9:08 ` Vinod Koul
2018-04-17 11:43 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-17 12:54 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2018-04-17 13:46 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-04-17 13:58 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2018-04-17 14:53 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-04-17 15:54 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2018-04-18 6:31 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-04-18 13:06 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2018-04-19 11:40 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-04-24 3:55 ` Vinod Koul
2018-04-24 9:50 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-05-17 6:39 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-05-29 15:04 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-05-30 17:29 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-06-01 10:17 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-06-01 10:24 ` [RFC] dmaengine: Add metadat_ops for dma_async_tx_descriptor Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-02 6:59 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-07-10 5:52 ` Vinod
2018-07-18 10:06 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-19 9:22 ` Vinod
2018-07-20 13:42 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-24 11:14 ` Vinod
2018-07-30 9:46 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-07-31 4:29 ` Vinod [this message]
2018-04-17 15:42 ` [RFC 2/6] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Pass AXI4-Stream control words to netdev dma client Vinod Koul
2018-04-17 15:44 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2018-04-18 6:39 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-04-18 7:03 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2018-04-02 10:39 ` [RFC 3/6] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Increase AXI DMA transaction segment count Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-02 10:39 ` [RFC 4/6] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Freeup active list based on descriptor completion bit Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-11 9:11 ` Vinod Koul
2018-04-17 12:28 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-23 5:23 ` Vinod Koul
2018-04-02 10:39 ` [RFC 5/6] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Program interrupt delay timeout Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-11 9:11 ` Vinod Koul
2018-04-17 12:48 ` Radhey Shyam Pandey
2018-04-02 10:39 ` [RFC 6/6] dmaengine: xilinx_dma: Use tasklet_hi_schedule for timing critical usecase Radhey Shyam Pandey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180731042903.GC16775@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox