From: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (Bjorn Andersson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 21:34:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731043403.GF5090@builder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4bd9f57-617a-a59e-5d05-be1a6b3e6b3d@ti.com>
On Mon 02 Jul 05:08 PDT 2018, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>:
> >> Hi Bartosz,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
> >>>
> >>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order
> >>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset
> >>> framework.
> >>>
> >>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches
> >>> merged.
> >>
> >> Series looks good to me.
> >>
> >> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1
> >> and #2 ?
> >>
> >> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the
> >> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers.
> >>
> >> Open to other suggestions as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sekhar
> >
> > Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend?
>
> With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit
> to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you
> want to queue from your tree.
>
I'm not sure why I didn't see your request earlier, sorry about that.
I seem to have one other davinci patch from Suman, which should be
possible to merge without any conflicts. So there's no need for an
immutable branch at this time.
Regards,
Bjorn
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-31 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 7:37 [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-21 7:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] remoteproc/davinci: use " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-23 8:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-31 4:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
2018-07-31 7:55 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-31 10:04 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 7:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-06 17:54 ` David Lechner
2018-10-02 15:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-10-02 15:28 ` David Lechner
2018-10-02 15:54 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-06-21 7:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-02 11:57 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 7:37 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-02 12:02 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 10:52 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework Sekhar Nori
2018-06-21 11:41 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-07-02 12:08 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-02 15:27 ` David Lechner
2018-07-03 4:42 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-07-31 4:34 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180731043403.GF5090@builder \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).