From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH mmc-next v2 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: solve 128MB DMA boundary limitation
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:52:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180731135257.268924f3@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180731112924.6a1e8388@xhacker.debian>
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:29:24 +0800
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> wrote:
> Hi Robin,
>
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:06:08 +0100 Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> > Hi Jisheng,
> >
> > On 26/07/18 08:14, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > When using DMA, if the DMA addr spans 128MB boundary, we have to split
> > > the DMA transfer into two so that each one doesn't exceed the boundary.
> >
> > Out of interest, is the driver already setting its segment boundary mask
> > appropriately? This sounds like the exact kind of hardware restriction
> > that dma_parms is intended to describe, which scatterlist-generating
> > code is *supposed* to already respect.
>
> Thanks for the nice input. It may provide an elegant solution for this
> limitation.
>
> To simplify the situation, let's assume no iommu, only swiotlb. And
> the DDR is less than 4GB so swiotlb on arm64 doesn't init.
>
> There's no dma range limitation with the HW, the only limitation
> is boundary, while dma_capable() doesn't check the boundary mask, so if
> we taking this solution, we need to teach dma_capable() about the boundary
> mask, I'm not sure whether this is acceptable.
>
> Another problem is swiotlb initialization. When to init swiotlb, we dunno
> there's such boundary limitation HW. Is there any elegant solution for
> this problem?
>
One more problem is: swiotlb isn't available on all platforms, e.g arm?
How to solve this SDHCI HW's limitation on arm soc w/o iommu?
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-31 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 7:10 [PATCH mmc-next v2 0/3] solve SDHCI DWC MSHC 128MB DMA boundary limitation Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-26 7:12 ` [PATCH mmc-next v2 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add adma_table_num member to struct sdhci_host Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-26 7:12 ` [PATCH mmc-next v2 2/3] mmc: sdhci: introduce adma_write_desc() hook to struct sdhci_ops Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-26 7:14 ` [PATCH mmc-next v2 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: solve 128MB DMA boundary limitation Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-28 17:35 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-28 19:27 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-30 11:06 ` Robin Murphy
2018-07-31 3:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
2018-07-31 5:52 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180731135257.268924f3@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).