From: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce PCI software bridge common logic
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 11:54:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180801115430.388c62ae@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801092119.GB30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Hello Russell,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 10:21:19 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> All PCI devices must treat Configuration Space write operations
> to reserved registers as no-ops; that is, the access must be
> completed normally on the bus and the data discarded. Read
> accesses to reserved or unimplemented registers must be completed
> normally and a data value of 0 returned.
>
> (eg) PCI status:
> Reserved bits should be read-only and return zero when read.
> A one bit is reset (if it is not read-only) whenever the register
> is written, and the write data in the corresponding bit location
> is a 1.
>
> [which is why doing the read-modify-write action that some host
> bridges that only support 32-bit accesses is dangerous - it leads
> to various status bits being inadvertently reset.]
Speaking of this, the generic pci_generic_config_write32() function
indeed does this incorrectly, and prints a warning.
However, I just looked at the pci-thunder-pem code, and it seems to
correctly account for those W1C bits, by having an explicit list of
registers and their W1C bits (see thunder_pem_bridge_w1c_bits). This
isn't specific to the Thunder PCIe controller at all, and would benefit
from being made generic, no ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-01 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-29 9:22 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: emulated PCI bridge common logic Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-29 9:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce PCI software " Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-12 19:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-01 8:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-01 9:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-08-01 9:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-01 9:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-08-01 11:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-29 9:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: mvebu: Convert to PCI software bridge Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-29 9:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: aardvark: Implement emulated root PCI bridge Thomas Petazzoni
2022-01-07 21:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-07 23:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-10 9:17 ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-10 2:21 ` Marek Behún
2018-07-12 9:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI: emulated PCI bridge common logic Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180801115430.388c62ae@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).