linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce PCI software bridge common logic
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 11:54:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180801115430.388c62ae@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801092119.GB30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

Hello Russell,

On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 10:21:19 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:


>    All PCI devices must treat Configuration Space write operations
>    to reserved registers as no-ops; that is, the access must be
>    completed normally on the bus and the data discarded. Read
>    accesses to reserved or unimplemented registers must be completed
>    normally and a data value of 0 returned.
> 
> (eg) PCI status:
>    Reserved bits should be read-only and return zero when read.
>    A one bit is reset (if it is not read-only) whenever the register
>    is written, and the write data in the corresponding bit location
>    is a 1.
> 
> [which is why doing the read-modify-write action that some host
>  bridges that only support 32-bit accesses is dangerous - it leads
>  to various status bits being inadvertently reset.]

Speaking of this, the generic pci_generic_config_write32() function
indeed does this incorrectly, and prints a warning.

However, I just looked at the pci-thunder-pem code, and it seems to
correctly account for those W1C bits, by having an explicit list of
registers and their W1C bits (see thunder_pem_bridge_w1c_bits). This
isn't specific to the Thunder PCIe controller at all, and would benefit
from being made generic, no ?

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-01  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-29  9:22 [PATCH 0/3] PCI: emulated PCI bridge common logic Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-29  9:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce PCI software " Thomas Petazzoni
2018-07-12 19:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-08-01  8:49     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-01  9:21       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-08-01  9:37         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-08-01  9:54         ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-08-01 11:13       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-29  9:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: mvebu: Convert to PCI software bridge Thomas Petazzoni
2018-06-29  9:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: aardvark: Implement emulated root PCI bridge Thomas Petazzoni
2022-01-07 21:27   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-07 23:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-01-10  9:17       ` Pali Rohár
2022-01-10  2:21     ` Marek Behún
2018-07-12  9:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] PCI: emulated PCI bridge common logic Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180801115430.388c62ae@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).