From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gustavo@embeddedor.com (Gustavo A. R. Silva) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:59:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: alternative: Use true and false for boolean values Message-ID: <20180807235726.GA6756@embeddedor.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false instead of an integer value. This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c index 36fb069..b5d6039 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c @@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ static bool branch_insn_requires_update(struct alt_instr *alt, unsigned long pc) unsigned long replptr; if (kernel_text_address(pc)) - return 1; + return true; replptr = (unsigned long)ALT_REPL_PTR(alt); if (pc >= replptr && pc <= (replptr + alt->alt_len)) - return 0; + return false; /* * Branching into *another* alternate sequence is doomed, and -- 2.7.4