From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:27:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH mmc-next v3 0/3] solve SDHCI DWC MSHC 128MB DMA boundary
 limitation
In-Reply-To: <20180730104228.28b58bd0@xhacker.debian>
References: <20180730104228.28b58bd0@xhacker.debian>
Message-ID: <20180809102759.191d211e@xhacker.debian>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Adrian, Ulf,

could you please review these patches? Any comments are welcome.

Thanks in advance,
Jisheng

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 10:42:28 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> When using DMA, if the DMA addr spans 128MB boundary, we have to split
> the DMA transfer into two so that each one doesn't exceed the boundary.
> 
> patch1 adds adma_table_num to struct sdhci_host so that driver can
> control the ADMA table number.
> patch2 introduces adma_write_desc() hook to struct sdhci_ops so that
> driver can override it.
> patch3 finally solves the 128MB boundary limitation.
> 
> since v2:
>   - make use of "likely" to check (!len || BOUNDARY_OK(addr, len))
>   - explictly include <linux/sizes.h> for SZ_128M
> 
> since v1:
>   - fix BOUNDARY_OK macro if addr+len is aligned to 128MB
>   - use DIV_ROUND_UP to cal extra desc num
>   - fix !len for dwcmshc_adma_write_desc()
> 
> Jisheng Zhang (3):
>   mmc: sdhci: add adma_table_num member to struct sdhci_host
>   mmc: sdhci: introduce adma_write_desc() hook to struct sdhci_ops
>   mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: solve 128MB DMA boundary limitation
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c            | 48 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h            |  8 +++++
>  3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>