From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Srikar Dronamraju)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 01:49:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v8 5/6] trace_uprobe/sdt: Prevent multiple reference
 counter for same uprobe
In-Reply-To: <66f84261-aa3e-4692-a124-09537fda4312@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20180809041856.1547-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <20180809041856.1547-6-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
 <CAPhsuW5g1dOnceA=kqfpC+rR6EguJaR+wPwY9nSWLbGSSj5XjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <66f84261-aa3e-4692-a124-09537fda4312@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20180813084922.GB44470@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> [2018-08-13 13:49:44]:

> Hi Song,
> 
> On 08/11/2018 01:42 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > Do we really need this given we already have PATCH 4/6?
> > uprobe_regsiter() can be called
> > out of trace_uprobe, this patch won't catch all conflicts anyway.
> 
> Right but it, at least, catch all conflicts happening via trace_uprobe.
> 
> I don't mind in removing this patch but I would like to get an opinion of
> Oleg/Srikar/Steven/Masami.
> 

I would suggest to keep it, atleast it can ctah conflicts happening via
trace_uprobe.