From: rostedt@goodmis.org (Steven Rostedt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:03:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180813220315.6e8dfc9c@vmware.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b5c1092-2cc0-00ec-ba3d-341dc61452b4@arm.com>
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:54:06 +0100
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> wrote:
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Makefile
> > @@ -78,6 +78,15 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS),y)
> > KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += -T $(srctree)/arch/arm64/kernel/module.lds
> > endif
> >
> > +ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> > + CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -fpatchable-function-entry=2
> > + KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += -DCC_USING_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY
> > + ifeq ($(call cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=2),)
> > + $(warning Cannot use CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS: \
> > + -fpatchable-function-entry not supported by compiler)
>
> Shouldn't this be an error? The option -fpatchable-function-entry has
> been added to the CC_FLAGS_FTRACE, so any call to the compiler is gonna
> break anyway. Or am I missing something?
I'm guessing this adds a more informative message on that error. One
will know why -fpatchable-function-entry was added to the CFLAGS. I'm
for more informative error messages being a victim of poor error
messages causing me to dig deep into the guts of the build
infrastructure to figure out simple issues.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-14 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-10 16:00 [PATCH 0/3] arm64 live patching Torsten Duwe
2018-08-10 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm64: implement ftrace with regs Torsten Duwe
2018-08-10 19:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-13 10:54 ` Julien Thierry
2018-08-14 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-08-14 8:33 ` Julien Thierry
2018-08-14 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-15 13:47 ` Torsten Duwe
2018-08-10 16:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: implement live patching Torsten Duwe
2018-08-29 11:37 ` Miroslav Benes
2018-08-10 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: reliable stacktraces Torsten Duwe
2018-08-10 20:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180813220315.6e8dfc9c@vmware.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).