From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:59:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824085501.9740-2-peda@axentia.se>
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:00 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:
> If the divider used to get the pixel-clock is small, the granularity
> of the frequencies possible for the pixel-clock is quite coarse. E.g.
> requesting a pixel-clock of 65MHz with a sys_clk of 132MHz results
> in the divider being set to 3 ending up with 44MHz.
>
> By preferring the doubled sys_clk as base, the divider instead ends
> up as 5 yielding a pixel-clock of 52.8Mhz, which is a definite
> improvement.
>
> While at it, clamp the divider so that it does not overflow in case
> it gets big.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index c38a479ada98..71c9cd90d2ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -101,18 +101,22 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
> (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
> ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
>
> - cfg = 0;
> + cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
>
> - prate = clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
> + prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
> mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
> - if ((prate / 2) < mode_rate) {
> - prate *= 2;
> - cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> - }
>
> div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
> if (div < 2)
> div = 2;
I'm nitpicking, but can you add braces around the if() block?
Looks good otherwise.
> + else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
> + /* the divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate */
> + cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> + prate /= 2;
> + div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
> + if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
> + div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
> + }
>
> cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-24 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-24 8:54 [PATCH 0/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: revise selection of pixel-clock frequency divider Peter Rosin
2018-08-24 8:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base Peter Rosin
2018-08-24 8:59 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-08-24 8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock that requested Peter Rosin
2018-08-24 9:07 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).