linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:59:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824085501.9740-2-peda@axentia.se>

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:55:00 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:

> If the divider used to get the pixel-clock is small, the granularity
> of the frequencies possible for the pixel-clock is quite coarse. E.g.
> requesting a pixel-clock of 65MHz with a sys_clk of 132MHz results
> in the divider being set to 3 ending up with 44MHz.
> 
> By preferring the doubled sys_clk as base, the divider instead ends
> up as 5 yielding a pixel-clock of 52.8Mhz, which is a definite
> improvement.
> 
> While at it, clamp the divider so that it does not overflow in case
> it gets big.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> index c38a479ada98..71c9cd90d2ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -101,18 +101,22 @@ static void atmel_hlcdc_crtc_mode_set_nofb(struct drm_crtc *c)
>  		     (adj->crtc_hdisplay - 1) |
>  		     ((adj->crtc_vdisplay - 1) << 16));
>  
> -	cfg = 0;
> +	cfg = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
>  
> -	prate = clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
> +	prate = 2 * clk_get_rate(crtc->dc->hlcdc->sys_clk);
>  	mode_rate = adj->crtc_clock * 1000;
> -	if ((prate / 2) < mode_rate) {
> -		prate *= 2;
> -		cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> -	}
>  
>  	div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
>  	if (div < 2)
>  		div = 2;

I'm nitpicking, but can you add braces around the if() block?

Looks good otherwise.

> +	else if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK) {
> +		/* the divider ended up too big, try a lower base rate */
> +		cfg &= ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKSEL;
> +		prate /= 2;
> +		div = DIV_ROUND_UP(prate, mode_rate);
> +		if (ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div) & ~ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK)
> +			div = ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV_MASK;
> +	}
>  
>  	cfg |= ATMEL_HLCDC_CLKDIV(div);
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-24  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-24  8:54 [PATCH 0/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: revise selection of pixel-clock frequency divider Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: prefer a higher rate clock as pixel-clock base Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  8:59   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-08-24  8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock that requested Peter Rosin
2018-08-24  9:07   ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180824105939.24fe8013@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).