From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: solve 128MB DMA boundary limitation
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:39:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180827153936.7481ae13@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6302a5a4-35cf-3d8f-fcac-a15141fcf1d0@intel.com>
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:51:26 +0300 Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 23/08/18 13:09, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > When using DMA, if the DMA addr spans 128MB boundary, we have to split
> > the DMA transfer into two so that each one doesn't exceed the boundary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> > index 1b7cd144fb01..df0a3aeabe19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> > @@ -8,21 +8,48 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> >
> > #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
> >
> > +#define BOUNDARY_OK(addr, len) \
> > + ((addr | (SZ_128M - 1)) == ((addr + len - 1) | (SZ_128M - 1)))
> > +
> > struct dwcmshc_priv {
> > struct clk *bus_clk;
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * If DMA addr spans 128MB boundary, we split the DMA transfer into two
> > + * so that the DMA transfer doesn't exceed the boundary.
> > + */
> > +static void dwcmshc_adma_write_desc(struct sdhci_host *host, void **desc,
> > + dma_addr_t addr, int len, unsigned int cmd)
> > +{
> > + int tmplen, offset;
> > +
> > + if (likely(!len || BOUNDARY_OK(addr, len)))
> > + sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
>
> Doesn't this need a return? i.e.
>
> return;
oops, I made a mistake here. Pre v4, there's a return...
Thanks so much.
> }
>
> > +
> > + offset = addr & (SZ_128M - 1);
> > + tmplen = SZ_128M - offset;
> > + sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, tmplen, cmd);
> > +
> > + addr += tmplen;
> > + len -= tmplen;
> > + sdhci_adma_write_desc(host, desc, addr, len, cmd);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_dwcmshc_ops = {
> > .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
> > .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
> > .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
> > .get_max_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock,
> > .reset = sdhci_reset,
> > + .adma_write_desc = dwcmshc_adma_write_desc,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_dwcmshc_pdata = {
> > @@ -36,12 +63,24 @@ static int dwcmshc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct sdhci_host *host;
> > struct dwcmshc_priv *priv;
> > int err;
> > + u32 extra;
> >
> > host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_dwcmshc_pdata,
> > sizeof(struct dwcmshc_priv));
> > if (IS_ERR(host))
> > return PTR_ERR(host);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * The DMA table descriptor count is calculated as the maximum
> > + * number of segments times 2, to allow for an alignment
> > + * descriptor for each segment, plus 1 for a nop end descriptor,
> > + * plus extra number for cross 128M boundary handling.
> > + */
> > + extra = DIV_ROUND_UP(totalram_pages, SZ_128M / PAGE_SIZE);
>
> You are assuming here that totalram_pages gives you the highest physical
> page number. Is that true?
Per my understanding, it's true. What I need is the MemTotal/PAGE_SIZE where
Memtotal is from /proc/meminfo. After reading the code, I found this is
totalram_pages as shown in si_meminfo()
>
> > + if (extra > SDHCI_MAX_SEGS)
> > + extra = SDHCI_MAX_SEGS;
> > + host->adma_table_cnt = SDHCI_MAX_SEGS * 2 + 1 + extra;
>
> That should be:
>
> host->adma_table_cnt += extra;
yep, will do in v5
>
> > +
> > pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/3] solve SDHCI DWC MSHC 128MB DMA boundary limitation Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add adma_table_cnt member to struct sdhci_host Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-23 11:27 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-08-23 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: sdhci: introduce adma_write_desc() hook to struct sdhci_ops Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-23 11:29 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-08-23 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-dwcmshc: solve 128MB DMA boundary limitation Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-23 11:51 ` Adrian Hunter
2018-08-27 7:39 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180827153936.7481ae13@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).