From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:28:00 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v13 03/16] s390, kexec_file: drop arch_kexec_mem_walk()
In-Reply-To: <20180828134347.GB12178@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
References: <20180801075820.3753-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
 <20180801075820.3753-4-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
 <20180801102951.527cfc57@ThinkPad>
 <20180802000150.GN11258@linaro.org>
 <20180806055047.GC4246@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <20180809033416.GA5069@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
 <1235507889.17337085.1533788045597.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20180828052107.GE12252@linaro.org>
 <20180828134347.GB12178@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20180829002759.GG12252@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 09:43:47PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi AKASHI,
> On 08/28/18 at 02:21pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 12:14:05AM -0400, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Dave Young" <dyoung@redhat.com>
> > > > To: "AKASHI Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, "Philipp Rudo" <prudo@linux.ibm.com>, "catalin marinas"
> > > > <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, "will deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>, dhowells at redhat.com, vgoyal at redhat.com,
> > > > herbert at gondor.apana.org.au, davem at davemloft.net, bhe at redhat.com, arnd at arndb.de, schwidefsky at de.ibm.com, "heiko
> > > > carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, "ard biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, "james morse"
> > > > <james.morse@arm.com>, bhsharma at redhat.com, kexec at lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org,
> > > > linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, "piliu at redhat.com Thiago Jung Bauermann" <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 11:34:16 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/16] s390, kexec_file: drop arch_kexec_mem_walk()
> > > > 
> > > > Add more cc. Pingfan Liu confirmed ppc does not use 0 as valid address,
> > > > if so it should be safe.
> > > > 
> > > > Pingfan, can you add more words?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > ppc64 uses a few KB starting from 0 for exception handler.
> > 
> > It assures that 0 (zero) is valid, but won't be assigned as a result of
> > kexec_add_buffer().
> > 
> > So do you think that yet I should submit another patch set, introducing
> > explicit KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN, while assuming 0 by default is safe for now?
> > 
> > Now that this is the only comment against my v13, it's up to you.
> 
> I'm fine with your proposal.  It is simple enough, and we can look into
> it when it becomes a problem in the future which is unlikely.

Ok, thank you for this confirmation.

-Takahiro AKASHI

> Thanks
> Dave