From: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org (Manivannan Sadhasivam)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/5] pinctrl: actions: define pad control configurtion to SoC specific
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:02:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829153214.GB21136@Mani-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829082413.2512005-3-sravanhome@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:24:10AM +0200, Saravanan Sekar wrote:
> pad control for s900 and s700 are differs in number of
> pull control configuraions
> s900 has 4 pull controls - high impedence, pull up, pull down, repeater
> s700, s500 has 2 pull controls - pull up and pull down
>
> so pad control configuration has to SoC specific, moved out from pinctrl
> common to s700, s900 specific.
>
This patch is not adding anything for S700 so no need to mention it in
last line.
> Signed-off-by: Parthiban Nallathambi <pn@denx.de>
> Signed-off-by: Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c | 64 +++++----------------------------
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h | 13 ++++---
> drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s900.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> index 9d18c02f192b..cc242d6a47c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.c
> @@ -246,60 +246,6 @@ static int owl_pad_pinconf_reg(const struct owl_padinfo *info,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int owl_pad_pinconf_arg2val(const struct owl_padinfo *info,
> - unsigned int param,
> - u32 *arg)
> -{
> - switch (param) {
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD:
> - *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HOLD;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE:
> - *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HIZ;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> - *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_DOWN;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> - *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_UP;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
> - *arg = (*arg >= 1 ? 1 : 0);
> - break;
> - default:
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int owl_pad_pinconf_val2arg(const struct owl_padinfo *padinfo,
> - unsigned int param,
> - u32 *arg)
> -{
> - switch (param) {
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD:
> - *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HOLD;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE:
> - *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HIZ;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> - *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_DOWN;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> - *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_UP;
> - break;
> - case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
> - *arg = *arg == 1;
> - break;
> - default:
> - return -ENOTSUPP;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int owl_pin_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev,
> unsigned int pin,
> unsigned long *config)
> @@ -318,7 +264,10 @@ static int owl_pin_config_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev,
>
> arg = owl_read_field(pctrl, reg, bit, width);
>
> - ret = owl_pad_pinconf_val2arg(info, param, &arg);
> + if (!pctrl->soc->padctl_val2arg)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + ret = pctrl->soc->padctl_val2arg(info, param, &arg);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -349,7 +298,10 @@ static int owl_pin_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrldev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = owl_pad_pinconf_arg2val(info, param, &arg);
> + if (!pctrl->soc->padctl_arg2val)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + ret = pctrl->soc->padctl_arg2val(info, param, &arg);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h
> index 31cc33d7c4a5..dae2e8363fd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-owl.h
> @@ -145,13 +145,6 @@
> .shared_ctl_offset = _share, \
> }
>
> -enum owl_pinconf_pull {
> - OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HIZ,
> - OWL_PINCONF_PULL_DOWN,
> - OWL_PINCONF_PULL_UP,
> - OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HOLD,
> -};
> -
> enum owl_pinconf_drv {
> OWL_PINCONF_DRV_2MA,
> OWL_PINCONF_DRV_4MA,
> @@ -305,6 +298,12 @@ struct owl_pinctrl_soc_data {
> unsigned int ngpios;
> const struct owl_gpio_port *ports;
> unsigned int nports;
> + int (*padctl_val2arg)(const struct owl_padinfo *padinfo,
> + unsigned int param,
> + u32 *arg);
> + int (*padctl_arg2val)(const struct owl_padinfo *info,
> + unsigned int param,
> + u32 *arg);
> };
>
> int owl_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s900.c b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s900.c
> index 0597009d8369..2e19fecbe5e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s900.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/actions/pinctrl-s900.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/pinctrl.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf-generic.h>
> #include "pinctrl-owl.h"
>
> /* Pinctrl registers offset */
> @@ -1717,6 +1718,67 @@ static const struct owl_gpio_port s900_gpio_ports[] = {
> OWL_GPIO_PORT(F, 0x00F0, 8, 0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0x460, 0x140, 0x144, 0x178, 0)
> };
>
> +enum owl_pinconf_pull {
Since this enum is SoC specific, it could be s900_pinconf_pull.
Regards,
Mani
> + OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HIZ,
> + OWL_PINCONF_PULL_DOWN,
> + OWL_PINCONF_PULL_UP,
> + OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HOLD,
> +};
> +
> +static int s900_pad_pinconf_arg2val(const struct owl_padinfo *info,
> + unsigned int param,
> + u32 *arg)
> +{
> + switch (param) {
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD:
> + *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HOLD;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE:
> + *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HIZ;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> + *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_DOWN;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> + *arg = OWL_PINCONF_PULL_UP;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
> + *arg = (*arg >= 1 ? 1 : 0);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int s900_pad_pinconf_val2arg(const struct owl_padinfo *padinfo,
> + unsigned int param,
> + u32 *arg)
> +{
> + switch (param) {
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_BUS_HOLD:
> + *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HOLD;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE:
> + *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_HIZ;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
> + *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_DOWN;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
> + *arg = *arg == OWL_PINCONF_PULL_UP;
> + break;
> + case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_SCHMITT_ENABLE:
> + *arg = *arg == 1;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct owl_pinctrl_soc_data s900_pinctrl_data = {
> .padinfo = s900_padinfo,
> .pins = (const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *)s900_pads,
> @@ -1727,7 +1789,9 @@ static struct owl_pinctrl_soc_data s900_pinctrl_data = {
> .ngroups = ARRAY_SIZE(s900_groups),
> .ngpios = NUM_GPIOS,
> .ports = s900_gpio_ports,
> - .nports = ARRAY_SIZE(s900_gpio_ports)
> + .nports = ARRAY_SIZE(s900_gpio_ports),
> + .padctl_arg2val = s900_pad_pinconf_arg2val,
> + .padctl_val2arg = s900_pad_pinconf_val2arg,
> };
>
> static int s900_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.14.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 8:24 [PATCH v5 0/5] Add Actions Semi S700 pinctrl support Saravanan Sekar
2018-08-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] pinctrl: actions: define constructor generic to Actions Semi SoC's Saravanan Sekar
2018-08-29 15:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-04 18:41 ` Saravanan Sekar
2018-11-06 16:43 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-11-09 9:43 ` Linus Walleij
2018-11-12 16:27 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-08-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] pinctrl: actions: define pad control configurtion to SoC specific Saravanan Sekar
2018-08-29 15:32 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2018-11-12 16:29 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-08-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add bindings for Actions Semi S700 SoC Saravanan Sekar
2018-08-29 15:50 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-04 18:57 ` Saravanan Sekar
2018-11-06 16:44 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-11-12 16:32 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-08-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] pinctrl: actions: Add Actions Semi S700 pinctrl driver Saravanan Sekar
2018-08-29 16:34 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-09-04 19:28 ` Saravanan Sekar
2018-11-06 16:44 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-11-06 17:25 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2018-11-06 18:02 ` Parthiban Nallathambi
2018-08-29 8:24 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arm64: dts: actions: Add pinctrl node for Actions Semi S700 Saravanan Sekar
2018-08-30 17:05 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829153214.GB21136@Mani-XPS-13-9360 \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox