linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: mvneta: reduce smp_processor_id() calling in mvneta_tx_done_gbe
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:11:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180831161109.23db0901@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180831160810.2539ef4c@xhacker.debian>

In the loop of mvneta_tx_done_gbe(), we call the smp_processor_id()
each time, move the call out of the loop to optimize the code a bit.

Before the patch, the loop looks like(under arm64):

        ldr     x1, [x29,#120]
        ...
        ldr     w24, [x1,#36]
        ...
        bl      0 <_raw_spin_lock>
        str     w24, [x27,#132]
        ...

After the patch, the loop looks like(under arm64):

        ...
        bl      0 <_raw_spin_lock>
        str     w23, [x28,#132]
        ...
where w23 is loaded so be ready before the loop.

>From another side, mvneta_tx_done_gbe() is called from mvneta_poll()
which is in non-preemptible context, so it's safe to call the
smp_processor_id() function once.

Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index bcd20ebb2ebd..fe3edb3c2bf4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -2507,12 +2507,13 @@ static void mvneta_tx_done_gbe(struct mvneta_port *pp, u32 cause_tx_done)
 {
 	struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq;
 	struct netdev_queue *nq;
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	while (cause_tx_done) {
 		txq = mvneta_tx_done_policy(pp, cause_tx_done);
 
 		nq = netdev_get_tx_queue(pp->dev, txq->id);
-		__netif_tx_lock(nq, smp_processor_id());
+		__netif_tx_lock(nq, cpu);
 
 		if (txq->count)
 			mvneta_txq_done(pp, txq);
-- 
2.18.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-31  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-31  8:08 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: mvneta: some small improvements Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-31  8:09 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: mvneta: Don't check NETIF_F_GRO ourself Jisheng Zhang
2018-08-31  8:10 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: mvneta: enable NETIF_F_RXCSUM by default Jisheng Zhang
2018-09-02 18:21   ` Andrew Lunn
2018-08-31  8:11 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2018-09-02 21:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: mvneta: some small improvements David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180831161109.23db0901@xhacker.debian \
    --to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).