From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:14:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: change the A64 HDMI PHY binding to R40 In-Reply-To: <20180903133434.58188-2-icenowy@aosc.io> References: <20180903133434.58188-1-icenowy@aosc.io> <20180903133434.58188-2-icenowy@aosc.io> Message-ID: <20180905071435.lgsogpzmh5nw6bcy@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:34:32PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > By experiment, the A64 HDMi PHY doesn't support the PLL-VIDEO mux > introduced in R40, although it has two PLL-VIDEOs. > > Change the A64 HDMI PHY binding to R40 one. > > This binding is introduced in v4.19, which is still in RC stage, so we > have change to fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng That doesn't make much sense. The A64 doesn't have any particular reason to behave like the R40, and the R40 can definitely use a different compatible if it has a different behaviour. But I don't see *why* the A64 not behaving like the R40 is a justification to remove the A64 compatible. Especially when the R40 was released later. Add a new compatible, and leave the A64 compatible alone. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: