From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yaojun8558363@gmail.com (Jun Yao) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:41:53 +0800 Subject: [RESEND PATCH v4 5/6] arm64/mm: Populate the swapper_pg_dir by fixmap. In-Reply-To: <2bf9b9d1-271c-f85e-5a98-0eb74f2fedd9@arm.com> References: <20180822095432.12125-1-yaojun8558363@gmail.com> <20180822095432.12125-6-yaojun8558363@gmail.com> <2bf9b9d1-271c-f85e-5a98-0eb74f2fedd9@arm.com> Message-ID: <20180910114153.GA10734@toy> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi James, On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:58:22AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > On 22/08/18 10:54, Jun Yao wrote: > > WRITE_ONCE(*pmdp, pmd); > > dsb(ishst); > > } > > @@ -480,6 +511,19 @@ static inline phys_addr_t pmd_page_paddr(pmd_t pmd) > > > > static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud) > > { > > +#ifdef __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED > > + if (in_swapper_pgdir(pudp)) { > > + pud_t *fixmap_pudp; > > + > > + spin_lock(&swapper_pgdir_lock); > > + fixmap_pudp = (pud_t *)pgd_set_fixmap(__pa(pudp)); > > This is a bit subtle: are you using the pgd fixmap entry because the path from > map_mem() uses the other three? > > Using the pgd fix slot for a pud looks a bit strange to me, but its arguably a > side-effect of the folding. Yes, it's a side-effect of the folding. When the CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 3, the pud is folded into the pgd. It means that the pgd is never none and it is also a pud. That's why I use the pgd fixmap entry. Maybe write this more clearly: static inline void set_pud(pud_t *pudp, pud_t pud) { #ifdef __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED pgd_t *pgdp = (pgd_t *)pudp; if (...) { pgd_t *fixmap_pgdp; pud_t *fixmap_pudp; spin_lock(...); fixmap_pgdp = pgd_set_fixmap(__pa(pgdp)); fixmap_pudp = pud_set_fixmap_offset(fixmap_pgdp, 0UL); ... } Do you have any way to make it look more reasonable? > I see this called 68 times during boot on a 64K/42bit-VA, 65 of which appear to > be during paging_init(). What do you think to keeping paging_init()s use of the > pgd fixmap for swapper_pg_dir, deliberately to skip the in_swapper_pgdir() test > during paging_init()? I think the set_pud() should not be called on a 64K/42bit-VA. As only the level 2 and level 3 page tables are in use. It means that the pmd is folded into the pud and the pud is never none. So the set_pud() should not be called. I think a variable can be introduced to indicate whether paging_init() has been completed. And decide whether or not to skip the in_swapper_pgdir() base on the value of it. I don't know if this is reasonable. What do you think? Thanks, Jun