From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: clabbe@baylibre.com (LABBE Corentin) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:50:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: rename setbits32/clrbits32 to setbits32_be/clrbits32_be In-Reply-To: References: <1536349307-20714-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com> <1536349307-20714-2-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com> Message-ID: <20180910185039.GB7819@Red> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:16:56AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote: > > > Le 07/09/2018 ? 21:41, Corentin Labbe a ?crit?: > > Since setbits32/clrbits32 work on be32, it's better to remove ambiguity on > > the used data type. > > Wouldn't it be better to call them setbits_be32() / clrbits_be32() to > have something looking similar to in_be32() / ou_be32() ? > I agree, I will update the patch. Thanks