From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: himanshujha199640@gmail.com (Himanshu Jha)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:18:49 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: at91: fix wrong channel number in
 triggered buffer mode
In-Reply-To: <20180922113616.2d849fb0@archlinux>
References: <1537447238-18674-2-git-send-email-eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
 <201809211544.zop1vk8B%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20180922113616.2d849fb0@archlinux>
Message-ID: <20180922114849.GA3890@himanshu-Vostro-3559>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 11:36:16AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 15:26:03 +0800
> kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Eugen,
> This one is leaving me stumped...
> 
> Anyone care to point out what I'm missing that is wrong here?
> 
> Also Eugen, please don't cc stable on a patch directly.  It is fine to send
> a backport request once a patch has hit mainline, but before that it's just
> adding noise to a list as they won't take it directly anyway.

Song is correct on this one.

So, just replace the declaration to:

	struct iio_chan_spec const *chan;

and then warning goes away...

Another thing, its better not to reply the automated bot and instead to
the author by changing "From" address. :)

That is what I do often when replying to that thread.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180921182616.GA2077 at himanshu-Vostro-3559/

And it nests properly in the given thread avoiding any noise to kbuild
bot.


-- 
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology