[PATCH 0/2] STM32: Fixes for 4.19 cycle

[olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)]

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:28:17AM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Olof
> 
> On 09/24/2018 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Alexandre Torgue
> > <alexandre.torgue@st.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Olof
> > > 
> > > On 09/23/2018 02:34 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Alexandre,
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 06:34:15PM +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Arnd, olof and Kevin
> > > > > 
> > > > > Those 2 patches fixe the same issue on 4.19-rc: a bad usage of the mdma
> > > > > binding inside stm32mp157c.dts file. Can you please add them as fixe for
> > > > > 4.19 ?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The patches only mention removing unused property contents, not what the
> > > > bug is
> > > > that it fixes (or if it's even causing any problems). Care you clarify?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Sure.
> > > Concerning SPI patch: without this patch, DMA request will fail but there
> > > will be no crash because SPI will switch in interrupt mode.
> > > Concerning HASH one, it's just to align DT with dt-bindings documentation.
> > > Regarding the minor issue that they fix I could understand that you postpone
> > > the merge of those two patches for 4.20.
> > 
> > The former sounds like an appropriate fix, but the latter is probably
> > 4.20 material, indeed.
> > 
> > Should I just cherry-pick the two patches, or do you want to re-stage
> > new branches?
> 
> I have nothing else to send for v4.20 so if you can directly take those two
> patches for v4.20, I agree.

Thanks! Applied to fixes and next/dt respectively.


-Olof