From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 18:27:01 +0200
Subject: [RFC PATCH i2c-next 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: aspeed: Add
 'idle-wait-timeout-ms' setting
In-Reply-To: <f20a2e1d-e1db-1e63-3df8-ad650b931f7d@linux.intel.com>
References: <20180910214519.14126-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
 <20180910214519.14126-2-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com>
 <a81a6092-a9d0-78d5-3596-cddc5d6a0713@linux.intel.com>
 <20180924215850.GD18592@kunai>
 <2c8563fd-0641-5237-0026-f559c480ad91@linux.intel.com>
 <20180925082717.GB2270@kunai>
 <7b4e5715-3a87-8f77-8d0d-4647f02c87a8@linux.intel.com>
 <f20a2e1d-e1db-1e63-3df8-ad650b931f7d@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <20180926162701.GB2736@kunai>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org


> Should I use timeout in struct i2c_adapter instead just like i2c-mpc
> does?

I would accept that.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180926/1368bbfa/attachment.sig>