From: quentin.schulz@bootlin.com (Quentin Schulz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/dp: fix link probing for devices supporting DP 1.4+
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 11:27:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181001092708.ow4rxgzp4haax76k@qschulz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921075929.GA28323@intel.com>
Hi Manasi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:59:30AM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. Verified with the DP 1.4 spec and looks good to me.
> Also look at the related patch that makes use of the correct extended capabilities:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/249400/
>
If I'm not mistaken, you could get rid of the patch in the Intel driver
when we have this one merged. Is there any reason not to, have I missed
something?
Thanks,
Quentin
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>
> Manasi
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 03:54:37PM +0100, Damian Kos wrote:
> > From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > DP 1.4 introduced a DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit in
> > DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL register. If set, DPCD registers from
> > DP_DPCD_REV to DP_ADAPTER_CAP should be retrieved starting from
> > DP_DPCD_REV_EXTENDED. All registers are copied except DP_DPCD_REV,
> > DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT which represent the
> > "true capabilities" of DPRX device.
> >
> > Original DP_DPCD_REV, DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT
> > might falsely return lower capabilities to "avoid interoperability
> > issues with some of the existing DP Source devices that malfunction
> > when they discover the higher capabilities within those three
> > registers.".
> >
> > Before DP 1.4, DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit was reserved
> > and read 0 so it's safe to check against it even if DP revision is
> > <1.4
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Damian Kos <dkos@cadence.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 8c6b9fd89f8a..735ebde5c2f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -370,10 +370,38 @@ int drm_dp_link_probe(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_link *link)
> > {
> > u8 values[3];
> > int err;
> > + unsigned int addr;
> >
> > memset(link, 0, sizeof(*link));
> >
> > - err = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux, DP_DPCD_REV, values, sizeof(values));
> > + /*
> > + * DP 1.4 introduced a DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit in
> > + * DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL register. If set, DPCD registers from
> > + * DP_DPCD_REV to DP_ADAPTER_CAP should be retrieved starting from
> > + * DP_DPCD_REV_EXTENDED. All registers are copied except DP_DPCD_REV,
> > + * DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT which represent the
> > + * "true capabilities" of DPRX device.
> > + *
> > + * Original DP_DPCD_REV, DP_MAX_LINK_RATE and DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT
> > + * might falsely return lower capabilities to "avoid interoperability
> > + * issues with some of the existing DP Source devices that malfunction
> > + * when they discover the higher capabilities within those three
> > + * registers.".
> > + *
> > + * Before DP 1.4, DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT bit was reserved
> > + * and read 0 so it's safe to check against it even if DP revision is
> > + * <1.4
> > + */
> > + err = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_TRAINING_AUX_RD_INTERVAL, values);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + return err;
> > +
> > + if (values[0] & DP_EXTENDED_RECEIVER_CAP_FIELD_PRESENT)
> > + addr = DP_DP13_DPCD_REV;
> > + else
> > + addr = DP_DPCD_REV;
> > +
> > + err = drm_dp_dpcd_read(aux, addr, values, sizeof(values));
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20181001/22ec5949/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-01 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-20 14:54 [PATCH v4 0/5] drm: add support for Cadence MHDP DPI/DP bridge Damian Kos
2018-09-20 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] drm/rockchip: prepare common code for cdns and rk dpi/dp driver Damian Kos
2018-09-20 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/dp: fix link probing for devices supporting DP 1.4+ Damian Kos
2018-09-21 7:59 ` Manasi Navare
2018-10-01 9:27 ` Quentin Schulz [this message]
2018-10-02 13:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-20 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/dp: make dp_get_lane_status usable from outside of the core Damian Kos
2018-09-20 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: Document Cadence MHDP bridge bindings Damian Kos
2018-09-20 14:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] drm: bridge: add support for Cadence MHDP DPI/DP bridge Damian Kos
2018-09-21 8:41 ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-09-24 11:40 ` Damian Kos
2018-09-24 12:28 ` Heiko Stuebner
2018-09-24 12:47 ` Damian Kos
2018-09-21 14:01 ` Sean Paul
2018-09-24 10:22 ` Damian Kos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181001092708.ow4rxgzp4haax76k@qschulz \
--to=quentin.schulz@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox