From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gustavo@embeddedor.com (Gustavo A. R. Silva) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 12:09:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: meson-mx-sdio: mark expected switch fall-through Message-ID: <20181005100903.GA32057@embeddedor.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c index 2cfec33..abe253c 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void meson_mx_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) switch (ios->power_mode) { case MMC_POWER_OFF: vdd = 0; - /* fall-through: */ + /* fall through */ case MMC_POWER_UP: if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { host->error = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, -- 2.7.4