From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_map_page
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:02:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008080246.20543-8-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181008080246.20543-1-hch@lst.de>
Remove the somewhat useless map_single function, and replace it with a
swiotlb_bounce_page handler that handles everything related to actually
bouncing a page.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 15755d7a5242..4d7a4d85d71e 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -543,26 +543,6 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev,
return tlb_addr;
}
-/*
- * Allocates bounce buffer and returns its physical address.
- */
-static phys_addr_t
-map_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
- enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
-{
- dma_addr_t start_dma_addr;
-
- if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE) {
- dev_warn_ratelimited(hwdev, "Cannot do DMA to address %pa\n",
- &phys);
- return SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR;
- }
-
- start_dma_addr = __phys_to_dma(hwdev, io_tlb_start);
- return swiotlb_tbl_map_single(hwdev, start_dma_addr, phys, size,
- dir, attrs);
-}
-
/*
* tlb_addr is the physical address of the bounce buffer to unmap.
*/
@@ -714,6 +694,34 @@ static bool swiotlb_free_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size,
return true;
}
+static dma_addr_t swiotlb_bounce_page(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t *phys,
+ size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
+{
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr;
+
+ if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)) {
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(dev,
+ "Cannot do DMA to address %pa\n", phys);
+ return DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ /* Oh well, have to allocate and map a bounce buffer. */
+ *phys = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev, __phys_to_dma(dev, io_tlb_start),
+ *phys, size, dir, attrs);
+ if (*phys == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR)
+ return DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR;
+
+ /* Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble */
+ dma_addr = __phys_to_dma(dev, *phys);
+ if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size))) {
+ swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, *phys, size, dir,
+ attrs | DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
+ return DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR;
+ }
+
+ return dma_addr;
+}
+
/*
* Map a single buffer of the indicated size for DMA in streaming mode. The
* physical address to use is returned.
@@ -726,8 +734,8 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
enum dma_data_direction dir,
unsigned long attrs)
{
- phys_addr_t map, phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset;
- dma_addr_t dev_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
+ phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset;
+ dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
/*
@@ -735,26 +743,13 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
* we can safely return the device addr and not worry about bounce
* buffering it.
*/
- if (dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size) && swiotlb_force != SWIOTLB_FORCE)
- return dev_addr;
-
- trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, dev_addr, size, swiotlb_force);
-
- /* Oh well, have to allocate and map a bounce buffer. */
- map = map_single(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
- if (map == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR)
- return DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR;
-
- dev_addr = __phys_to_dma(dev, map);
-
- /* Ensure that the address returned is DMA'ble */
- if (dma_capable(dev, dev_addr, size))
- return dev_addr;
-
- attrs |= DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC;
- swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, map, size, dir, attrs);
+ if (!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size) ||
+ swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE) {
+ trace_swiotlb_bounced(dev, dma_addr, size, swiotlb_force);
+ dma_addr = swiotlb_bounce_page(dev, &phys, size, dir, attrs);
+ }
- return DIRECT_MAPPING_ERROR;
+ return dma_addr;
}
/*
--
2.19.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-08 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-08 8:02 move swiotlb noncoherent dma support from arm64 to generic code V2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] swiotlb: remove a pointless comment Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 17:49 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] swiotlb: mark is_swiotlb_buffer static Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 17:54 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] swiotlb: do not panic on mapping failures Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 18:06 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 0:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 13:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] swiotlb: remove the overflow buffer Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 18:19 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-12 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-19 0:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] swiotlb: merge swiotlb_unmap_page and unmap_single Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] swiotlb: use swiotlb_map_page in swiotlb_map_sg_attrs Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 17:53 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-11-07 1:27 ` John Stultz
2018-11-09 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-09 16:37 ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-19 19:36 ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-20 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-13 0:07 ` John Stultz
2018-11-13 0:26 ` John Stultz
2018-11-14 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 16:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 23:22 ` John Stultz
2018-11-20 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-23 18:27 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-23 19:34 ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-26 19:31 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-08 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-10-18 18:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_map_page Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 13:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] swiotlb: don't dip into swiotlb pool for coherent allocations Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-19 0:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 16:45 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] swiotlb: add support for non-coherent DMA Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 0:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-22 17:11 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-26 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-26 9:59 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: use the generic swiotlb_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 13:01 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-12 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 17:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-22 17:52 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-26 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181008080246.20543-8-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).