From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] swiotlb: don't dip into swiotlb pool for coherent allocations
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 10:02:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181008080246.20543-9-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181008080246.20543-1-hch@lst.de>
All architectures that support swiotlb also have a zone that backs up
these less than full addressing allocations (usually ZONE_DMA32).
Because of that it is rather pointless to fall back to the global swiotlb
buffer if the normal dma direct allocation failed - the only thing this
will do is to eat up bounce buffers that would be more useful to serve
streaming mappings.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 6 +--
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 5 --
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 105 +-----------------------------------
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
index 8d91b927e09e..eee6cfcfde9e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
return addr;
}
- ptr = swiotlb_alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
+ ptr = dma_direct_alloc_pages(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
if (!ptr)
goto no_mem;
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
return coherent_ptr;
no_map:
- swiotlb_free(dev, size, ptr, *dma_handle, attrs);
+ dma_direct_free_pages(dev, size, ptr, *dma_handle, attrs);
no_mem:
return NULL;
}
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
return;
vunmap(vaddr);
}
- swiotlb_free(dev, size, swiotlb_addr, dma_handle, attrs);
+ dma_direct_free_pages(dev, size, swiotlb_addr, dma_handle, attrs);
}
static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
index f847c1b265c4..a387b59640a4 100644
--- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
@@ -67,11 +67,6 @@ extern void swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev,
/* Accessory functions. */
-void *swiotlb_alloc(struct device *hwdev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
- gfp_t flags, unsigned long attrs);
-void swiotlb_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
- dma_addr_t dma_addr, unsigned long attrs);
-
extern dma_addr_t swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
unsigned long offset, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction dir,
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 4d7a4d85d71e..475a41eff3dc 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -622,78 +622,6 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
}
}
-static inline bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
- size_t size)
-{
- u64 mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
-
- if (dev && dev->coherent_dma_mask)
- mask = dev->coherent_dma_mask;
- return addr + size - 1 <= mask;
-}
-
-static void *
-swiotlb_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
- unsigned long attrs)
-{
- phys_addr_t phys_addr;
-
- if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE)
- goto out_warn;
-
- phys_addr = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev,
- __phys_to_dma(dev, io_tlb_start),
- 0, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, attrs);
- if (phys_addr == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR)
- goto out_warn;
-
- *dma_handle = __phys_to_dma(dev, phys_addr);
- if (!dma_coherent_ok(dev, *dma_handle, size))
- goto out_unmap;
-
- memset(phys_to_virt(phys_addr), 0, size);
- return phys_to_virt(phys_addr);
-
-out_unmap:
- dev_warn(dev, "hwdev DMA mask = 0x%016Lx, dev_addr = 0x%016Lx\n",
- (unsigned long long)dev->coherent_dma_mask,
- (unsigned long long)*dma_handle);
-
- /*
- * DMA_TO_DEVICE to avoid memcpy in unmap_single.
- * DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC is optional.
- */
- swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
- DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
-out_warn:
- if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN) && printk_ratelimit()) {
- dev_warn(dev,
- "swiotlb: coherent allocation failed, size=%zu\n",
- size);
- dump_stack();
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static bool swiotlb_free_buffer(struct device *dev, size_t size,
- dma_addr_t dma_addr)
-{
- phys_addr_t phys_addr = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_addr);
-
- WARN_ON_ONCE(irqs_disabled());
-
- if (!is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr))
- return false;
-
- /*
- * DMA_TO_DEVICE to avoid memcpy in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single.
- * DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC is optional.
- */
- swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(dev, phys_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
- DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
- return true;
-}
-
static dma_addr_t swiotlb_bounce_page(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t *phys,
size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
@@ -928,39 +856,10 @@ swiotlb_dma_supported(struct device *hwdev, u64 mask)
return __phys_to_dma(hwdev, io_tlb_end - 1) <= mask;
}
-void *swiotlb_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
- gfp_t gfp, unsigned long attrs)
-{
- void *vaddr;
-
- /* temporary workaround: */
- if (gfp & __GFP_NOWARN)
- attrs |= DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN;
-
- /*
- * Don't print a warning when the first allocation attempt fails.
- * swiotlb_alloc_coherent() will print a warning when the DMA memory
- * allocation ultimately failed.
- */
- gfp |= __GFP_NOWARN;
-
- vaddr = dma_direct_alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, gfp, attrs);
- if (!vaddr)
- vaddr = swiotlb_alloc_buffer(dev, size, dma_handle, attrs);
- return vaddr;
-}
-
-void swiotlb_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
- dma_addr_t dma_addr, unsigned long attrs)
-{
- if (!swiotlb_free_buffer(dev, size, dma_addr))
- dma_direct_free(dev, size, vaddr, dma_addr, attrs);
-}
-
const struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
.mapping_error = dma_direct_mapping_error,
- .alloc = swiotlb_alloc,
- .free = swiotlb_free,
+ .alloc = dma_direct_alloc,
+ .free = dma_direct_free,
.sync_single_for_cpu = swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu,
.sync_single_for_device = swiotlb_sync_single_for_device,
.sync_sg_for_cpu = swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu,
--
2.19.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-08 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-08 8:02 move swiotlb noncoherent dma support from arm64 to generic code V2 Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] swiotlb: remove a pointless comment Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 17:49 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] swiotlb: mark is_swiotlb_buffer static Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 17:54 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] swiotlb: do not panic on mapping failures Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 18:06 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:18 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 0:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 6:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 13:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] swiotlb: remove the overflow buffer Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-11 18:19 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-12 17:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-19 0:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] swiotlb: merge swiotlb_unmap_page and unmap_single Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] swiotlb: use swiotlb_map_page in swiotlb_map_sg_attrs Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 17:53 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-11-07 1:27 ` John Stultz
2018-11-09 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-09 16:37 ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-19 19:36 ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-20 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-13 0:07 ` John Stultz
2018-11-13 0:26 ` John Stultz
2018-11-14 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-14 16:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-19 23:22 ` John Stultz
2018-11-20 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-23 18:27 ` Will Deacon
2018-11-23 19:34 ` Robin Murphy
2018-11-26 19:31 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_map_page Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-18 18:09 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-19 0:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 6:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 13:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-08 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-10-12 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] swiotlb: don't dip into swiotlb pool for coherent allocations Catalin Marinas
2018-10-19 0:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-19 16:45 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] swiotlb: add support for non-coherent DMA Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-19 0:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-22 17:11 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-26 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-26 9:59 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-08 8:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: use the generic swiotlb_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 13:01 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-12 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-12 17:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-22 17:52 ` Robin Murphy
2018-10-26 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181008080246.20543-9-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).