linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jeyu@kernel.org (Jessica Yu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64/modules: Add rlimit checking for arm64 modules
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 16:32:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181012143254.idy65qbvaaw5k3ge@linux-8ccs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25951d99-8ba7-5c9e-938e-baf92395f9e0@intel.com>

+++ Dave Hansen [11/10/18 16:47 -0700]:
>On 10/11/2018 04:31 PM, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
>> +	if (check_inc_mod_rlimit(size))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>>  	p = __vmalloc_node_range(size, MODULE_ALIGN, module_alloc_base,
>>  				module_alloc_base + MODULES_VSIZE,
>>  				gfp_mask, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, 0,
>> @@ -65,6 +68,8 @@ void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	}
>>
>> +	update_mod_rlimit(p, size);
>
>Is there a reason we couldn't just rename all of the existing per-arch
>module_alloc() calls to be called, say, "arch_module_alloc()", then put
>this new rlimit code in a generic helper that does:
>
>
>	if (check_inc_mod_rlimit(size))
>		return NULL;
>
>	p = arch_module_alloc(...);
>
>	...
>
>	update_mod_rlimit(p, size);
>

I second this suggestion. Just make module_{alloc,memfree} generic,
non-weak functions that call the rlimit helpers in addition to the
arch-specific arch_module_{alloc,memfree} functions.

Jessica

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-11 23:31 [PATCH v2 0/7] Rlimit for module space Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] modules: Create rlimit " Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-12  0:35   ` Jann Horn
2018-10-12 17:04     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2018-10-12 17:22       ` Jann Horn
2018-10-13  0:04         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2018-10-13  0:09           ` Jann Horn
2018-10-23 11:32       ` Michal Hocko
2018-10-12 18:23     ` Jann Horn
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/modules: Add rlimit checking for x86 modules Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm/modules: Add rlimit checking for arm modules Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64/modules: Add rlimit checking for arm64 modules Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-11 23:47   ` Dave Hansen
2018-10-12 14:32     ` Jessica Yu [this message]
2018-10-12 22:01       ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2018-10-12 22:54         ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mips/modules: Add rlimit checking for mips modules Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] sparc/modules: Add rlimit for sparc modules Rick Edgecombe
2018-10-11 23:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] s390/modules: Add rlimit checking for s390 modules Rick Edgecombe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181012143254.idy65qbvaaw5k3ge@linux-8ccs \
    --to=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).