linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 2/15] KVM/MMU: Add tlb flush with range helper function
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:35:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181014093541.GW30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181014092734.GV30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:27:34AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:16:56AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Liran Alon wrote:
> > > > On 13 Oct 2018, at 17:53, lantianyu1986 at gmail.com wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > From: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>
> > > > 
> > > > This patch is to add wrapper functions for tlb_remote_flush_with_range
> > > > callback.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@microsoft.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Change sicne V3:
> > > >       Remove code of updating "tlbs_dirty"
> > > > Change since V2:
> > > >       Fix comment in the kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_range()
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > index c73d9f650de7..ff656d85903a 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> > > > @@ -264,6 +264,46 @@ static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 spte);
> > > > static union kvm_mmu_page_role
> > > > kvm_mmu_calc_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > > > 
> > > > +
> > > > +static inline bool kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return kvm_x86_ops->tlb_remote_flush_with_range;
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > Seems that kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range() is not used in this patch?
> > 
> > What's wrong with that? 
> > 
> > It provides the implementation and later patches make use of it. It's a
> > sensible way to split patches into small, self contained entities.
> 
> From what I can see of the patches that follow _this_ patch in the
> series, this function remains unused.  So, not only is it not used
> in this patch, it's not used in this series.

Note - I seem to have only received patches 1 through 4, so this is
based on the patches I've received.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-14  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-13 14:53 [PATCH V4 00/15] x86/KVM/Hyper-v: Add HV ept tlb range flush hypercall support in KVM lantianyu1986 at gmail.com
2018-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH V4 1/15] KVM: Add tlb_remote_flush_with_range callback in kvm_x86_ops lantianyu1986 at gmail.com
2018-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH V4 2/15] KVM/MMU: Add tlb flush with range helper function lantianyu1986 at gmail.com
2018-10-14  7:26   ` Liran Alon
2018-10-14  8:16     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-14  9:20       ` Liran Alon
2018-10-14 12:57         ` Tianyu Lan
2018-10-14  9:27       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-14  9:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2018-10-14 13:21           ` Tianyu Lan
2018-10-14 13:33             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-10-15 12:02       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH V4 3/15] KVM: Replace old tlb flush function with new one to flush a specified range lantianyu1986 at gmail.com
2018-10-13 14:53 ` [PATCH V4 4/15] KVM: Make kvm_set_spte_hva() return int lantianyu1986 at gmail.com
2018-10-15 12:04 ` [PATCH V4 00/15] x86/KVM/Hyper-v: Add HV ept tlb range flush hypercall support in KVM Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181014093541.GW30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).