From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:33:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mmc: uniphier-sd: two bug-fixes In-Reply-To: References: <1539356258-12374-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20181014223311.GE3260@kunai> Message-ID: <20181015073339.GB981@kunai> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > Some sub-systems rebase, and some do not. > It is up to the sub-system maintainer. We used to have a very strict rule to not rebase anything which ends up in linux-next. Dunno what happened to this rule but I liked it. > I know what you are saying, but this is how we develop in linux-next. I wonder about that... > You need to use "git rebase --onto". And what about lists with commit IDs tracking patches on their way upstream? Yes, there is git-patch-id, yet I think it is easier to admit that incremental changes happen anyway. I know Ulf view differs... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: