From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:54:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] i2c: imx: don't print error if DMA is not configured In-Reply-To: <9a3fc087-2fe5-6d57-9b65-a05e176bf53d@pengutronix.de> References: <20181018112615.29362-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20181018112615.29362-4-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20181028221123.GE1882@kunai> <9a3fc087-2fe5-6d57-9b65-a05e176bf53d@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20181029085408.GB4101@kunai> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 09:07:56AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > On 28.10.18 23:11, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:26:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > At least on i.MX5x variants is DMA event for I2C muxed with SDHC. So > > > it is project specific configuration and not an error. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel > > > > So, the first patch is not I2C realm, and the second is dropped. No > > comment about the third one? > > > > And is maybe someone from Pengutronix interested in maintaining this > > driver? Uwe maybe? That would speed up things for it... > > Should i resend it as single patch? I am fine with an ack here. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: