From: christoffer.dall@arm.com (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Allow implementations to be confined to using VHE
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:53:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181106075353.GF12057@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105143617.120602-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:36:14PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Some implementations may be forced to use VHE to work around HW
> errata, for example. Let's introduce a helper that checks for
> these cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c3469729f40c..0f2f782548cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
> struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>
> static inline bool kvm_arch_sve_requires_vhe(void) { return false; }
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe(void) { return false; }
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index ca1714148400..7d6e974d024a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -432,6 +432,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_arch_sve_requires_vhe(void)
> return system_supports_sve();
> }
>
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe(void)
> +{
> + /* Some implementations have defects that confine them to VHE */
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 66de2efddfca..bc90a1cdd27f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -1647,6 +1647,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
> kvm_pr_unimpl("SVE system without VHE unsupported. Broken cpu?");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> +
> + if (kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe()) {
> + kvm_pr_unimpl("CPU requiring VHE in non-VHE mode");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
So as per my previous comment, I'd prefer this function to only issue a
single call, and have the function in kvm_host.h check for all the
conditions, do the printing, etc.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Christoffer
> }
>
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-06 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 14:36 [PATCH 0/4] Workaround for Cortex-A76 erratum 1165522 Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Rework detection of SVE, !VHE systems Marc Zyngier
2018-11-06 7:52 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-08 19:14 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Allow implementations to be confined to using VHE Marc Zyngier
2018-11-06 7:53 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2018-11-08 17:51 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-08 19:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: KVM: Install stage-2 translation before enabling traps on VHE Marc Zyngier
2018-11-06 8:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-08 17:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: KVM: Implement workaround for Cortex-A76 erratum 1165522 Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 18:34 ` James Morse
2018-11-08 17:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-09 11:39 ` James Morse
2018-11-06 8:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-08 18:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-08 20:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-22 16:13 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-23 9:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-21 12:23 ` Julien Grall
2018-11-21 12:58 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181106075353.GF12057@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com \
--to=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).