linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoffer.dall@arm.com (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Allow implementations to be confined to using VHE
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:53:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181106075353.GF12057@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105143617.120602-3-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:36:14PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Some implementations may be forced to use VHE to work around HW
> errata, for example. Let's introduce a helper that checks for
> these cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   | 1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                | 5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c3469729f40c..0f2f782548cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -286,6 +286,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
>  struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>  
>  static inline bool kvm_arch_sve_requires_vhe(void) { return false; }
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe(void) { return false; }
>  static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index ca1714148400..7d6e974d024a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -432,6 +432,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_arch_sve_requires_vhe(void)
>  	return system_supports_sve();
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe(void)
> +{
> +	/* Some implementations have defects that confine them to VHE */
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 66de2efddfca..bc90a1cdd27f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -1647,6 +1647,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
>  			kvm_pr_unimpl("SVE system without VHE unsupported.  Broken cpu?");
>  			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe()) {
> +			kvm_pr_unimpl("CPU requiring VHE in non-VHE mode");
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +		}

So as per my previous comment, I'd prefer this function to only issue a
single call, and have the function in kvm_host.h check for all the
conditions, do the printing, etc.

Thoughts?


Thanks,

    Christoffer

>  	}
>  
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-06  7:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05 14:36 [PATCH 0/4] Workaround for Cortex-A76 erratum 1165522 Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: arm64: Rework detection of SVE, !VHE systems Marc Zyngier
2018-11-06  7:52   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-08 19:14     ` Dave Martin
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: arm64: Allow implementations to be confined to using VHE Marc Zyngier
2018-11-06  7:53   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2018-11-08 17:51     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-08 19:23   ` Dave Martin
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: KVM: Install stage-2 translation before enabling traps on VHE Marc Zyngier
2018-11-06  8:06   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-08 17:54     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 14:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: KVM: Implement workaround for Cortex-A76 erratum 1165522 Marc Zyngier
2018-11-05 18:34   ` James Morse
2018-11-08 17:18     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-09 11:39       ` James Morse
2018-11-06  8:15   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-08 18:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-08 20:10       ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-22 16:13         ` Marc Zyngier
2018-11-23  9:57           ` Christoffer Dall
2018-11-21 12:23   ` Julien Grall
2018-11-21 12:58     ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181106075353.GF12057@e113682-lin.lund.arm.com \
    --to=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).