linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/10] ARM: defconfig: Use the new FSL QSPI driver under the SPI framework
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:34:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108093451.08dfe63e@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b12936f5-871d-a982-13c5-9d894f4a1521@kontron.de>

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:36:13 +0000
Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.De> wrote:

> Hi Olof,
> 
> On 07.11.18 17:20, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:44 AM Frieder Schrempf
> > <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> wrote:  
> >>
> >> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@exceet.de>
> >>
> >> The new driver at spi/spi-fsl-qspi.c replaces the old SPI NOR driver
> >> at mtd/fsl-quadspi.c. Switch to the new driver in the defconfigs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@exceet.de>  
> > 
> > Hi Frieder,
> > 
> > This patch is part of a series that I didn't see the rest of, but in
> > general we prefer to merge these through arm-soc even if the driver
> > goes in through another tree. The way we'd prefer to handle it is that
> > once the driver lands, we'll take the config option change to turn it
> > on. To avoid our branches to break until both sides have landed, it
> > might be a good idea to keep both drivers on for a short while (one
> > release).
> > 
> > So, I'm not going to ack this since we avoid taking defconfig changes
> > through driver trees (these two defconfigs tend to churn a lot and we
> > don't want to create merge conflicts where we don't have to), but
> > we'll be happy to pick it up when the time comes.  
> 
> Ok, thank you for explaining the common practice. I will drop the config 
> changes for the next version and send it separately when the time is ready.
> 
> Both the old driver and the new one use the same compatible strings for 
> probing. Wouldn't that cause problems if both drivers are enabled for a 
> while, or am I missing something?

Or maybe we should not introduce a new Kconfig option and just reuse
the old one. It probably requires re-ordering patches a bit (patch 1
should be moved after patch 5). Then you have 2 choices:

1/ merge patch 1 and 6 so that the new driver effectively replaces the
   old one but uses the same Kconfig option
2/ remove the ability to compile the old driver when the new one is
   introduced: remove the line from drivers/mtd/spi-nor Makefile and
   move the Kconfig entry from drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig to
   drivers/spi/Kconfig. And remove the old code in a separate patch

I'm fine either way, but option #2 will probably make the patch
introducing the new driver bigger and hurt readability.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1541601809-16950-1-git-send-email-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
2018-11-07 14:43 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] ARM: dts: Reflect change of FSL QSPI driver and remove unused properties Frieder Schrempf
2018-11-07 14:43 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] arm64: " Frieder Schrempf
2018-11-07 14:43 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] ARM: defconfig: Use the new FSL QSPI driver under the SPI framework Frieder Schrempf
2018-11-07 16:20   ` Olof Johansson
2018-11-07 16:36     ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-11-07 23:08       ` Olof Johansson
2018-11-08  8:34       ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2018-11-12 10:46         ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-11-12 10:56           ` Boris Brezillon
2018-11-12 11:24             ` Schrempf Frieder
2018-11-07 14:43 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] ARM: dts: ls1021a: Remove fsl, qspi-has-second-chip as it is not used Frieder Schrempf
2018-11-07 14:43 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] ARM64: dts: ls1046a: " Frieder Schrempf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181108093451.08dfe63e@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).