[GIT PULL 0/3] arm64: tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[GIT PULL 0/3] arm64: tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[Thierry Reding]

Hi ARM SoC maintainers,

These pull requests are some follow-up changes to finally enable the
generic power domains for the Tegra XUSB block. This builds on top of
changes that were merged into v4.20-rc1, but because of some non-
trivial runtime dependencies I decided to hold back on these until
after the dust had settled.

Do you think it would be possible to merge these in for v4.20-rc2? I
realize that they are not actually fixes, but they merely add a couple
of lines to enable the power domains for XUSB as well as the
corresponding DT bindings.

Thanks,
Thierry

[GIT PULL 1/3] dt-bindings: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[Thierry Reding]

Hi ARM SoC maintainers,

The following changes since commit d9be10edf7d6040468f89824df0dfcfcbf3a693b:

  dt-bindings: Add Tegra PMC pad configuration bindings (2018-08-27 12:21:43 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-4.20-rc2-dt-bindings

for you to fetch changes up to 20c33013eaab16576ed9f13082481a0d9d45d365:

  dt-bindings: usb: xhci-tegra: Add power-domain details (2018-10-25 14:30:07 +0200)

Thanks,
Thierry

----------------------------------------------------------------
dt-bindings: Update for v4.20-rc2

This contains device tree binding updates for the XUSB controller to
allow multiple power domains to be specified.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Hunter (1):
      dt-bindings: usb: xhci-tegra: Add power-domain details

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

[GIT PULL 2/3] soc/tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[Thierry Reding]

Hi ARM SoC maintainers,

The following changes since commit 4a37f11c8f57ffd6f7397eaf372109d67edd3769:

  soc/tegra: pmc: Implement pad configuration via pinctrl (2018-08-27 12:25:18 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-4.20-rc2-soc

for you to fetch changes up to 87f9bf3040485ff13e6a5c1c83d0cc46165bdf9c:

  soc/tegra: pmc: Don't power-up XUSB power-domains (2018-10-25 14:30:45 +0200)

Thanks,
Thierry

----------------------------------------------------------------
soc/tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

Contains a single change to remove a workaround that's no longer needed.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Hunter (1):
      soc/tegra: pmc: Don't power-up XUSB power-domains

 drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

[GIT PULL 3/3] arm64: tegra: Device tree updates for v4.20-rc2

[Thierry Reding]

Hi ARM SoC maintainers,

The following changes since commit d9fd22447ba59a9b53a202fade977e82bfba8d8d:

  arm64: tegra: I2C on Tegra194 is not compatible with Tegra114 (2018-09-26 15:50:59 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-4.20-rc2-arm64-dt

for you to fetch changes up to 47787b6b7d6981d979bdb01475cd3dd7626dbda3:

  arm64: dts: tegra210: Add power-domains for xHCI (2018-10-25 14:31:25 +0200)

Thanks,
Thierry

----------------------------------------------------------------
arm64: tegra: Device tree updates for v4.20-rc2

This contains a single change to populate power domains for the XUSB
device on Tegra210.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Hunter (1):
      arm64: dts: tegra210: Add power-domains for xHCI

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

[GIT PULL 0/3] arm64: tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[Olof Johansson]

Hi Thierry,

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:53 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi ARM SoC maintainers,
>
> These pull requests are some follow-up changes to finally enable the
> generic power domains for the Tegra XUSB block. This builds on top of
> changes that were merged into v4.20-rc1, but because of some non-
> trivial runtime dependencies I decided to hold back on these until
> after the dust had settled.
>
> Do you think it would be possible to merge these in for v4.20-rc2? I
> realize that they are not actually fixes, but they merely add a couple
> of lines to enable the power domains for XUSB as well as the
> corresponding DT bindings.

Is anything broken without these changes, or is it more that the
dependency have landed and you're itching to get things enabled?

If it's the former we should chat (since it's an unfortunate
situation). If it's the latter I'm happy to queue them up for the next
merge window.


-Olof

[GIT PULL 0/3] arm64: tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[Thierry Reding]

On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 08:31:55AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:53 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi ARM SoC maintainers,
> >
> > These pull requests are some follow-up changes to finally enable the
> > generic power domains for the Tegra XUSB block. This builds on top of
> > changes that were merged into v4.20-rc1, but because of some non-
> > trivial runtime dependencies I decided to hold back on these until
> > after the dust had settled.
> >
> > Do you think it would be possible to merge these in for v4.20-rc2? I
> > realize that they are not actually fixes, but they merely add a couple
> > of lines to enable the power domains for XUSB as well as the
> > corresponding DT bindings.
> 
> Is anything broken without these changes, or is it more that the
> dependency have landed and you're itching to get things enabled?
> 
> If it's the former we should chat (since it's an unfortunate
> situation). If it's the latter I'm happy to queue them up for the next
> merge window.

Nothing's broken without these changes, but I figured that these two
dozen lines could still make it into v4.20. I know that this has
occasionally been done in the past for very small enablement patches
if they were small enough. I could've communicated this a little
earlier, so that this wouldn't have come as a bit of a surprise.

If you prefer to defer this to v4.21 that's totally fine. I can queue
them up in my tree for the next merge window, no need for you to pick
this up in pieces.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20181108/c46528a0/attachment.sig>

[GIT PULL 0/3] arm64: tegra: Updates for v4.20-rc2

[Olof Johansson]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:16:27PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 08:31:55AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 6:53 AM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi ARM SoC maintainers,
> > >
> > > These pull requests are some follow-up changes to finally enable the
> > > generic power domains for the Tegra XUSB block. This builds on top of
> > > changes that were merged into v4.20-rc1, but because of some non-
> > > trivial runtime dependencies I decided to hold back on these until
> > > after the dust had settled.
> > >
> > > Do you think it would be possible to merge these in for v4.20-rc2? I
> > > realize that they are not actually fixes, but they merely add a couple
> > > of lines to enable the power domains for XUSB as well as the
> > > corresponding DT bindings.
> > 
> > Is anything broken without these changes, or is it more that the
> > dependency have landed and you're itching to get things enabled?
> > 
> > If it's the former we should chat (since it's an unfortunate
> > situation). If it's the latter I'm happy to queue them up for the next
> > merge window.
> 
> Nothing's broken without these changes, but I figured that these two
> dozen lines could still make it into v4.20. I know that this has
> occasionally been done in the past for very small enablement patches
> if they were small enough. I could've communicated this a little
> earlier, so that this wouldn't have come as a bit of a surprise.
> 
> If you prefer to defer this to v4.21 that's totally fine. I can queue
> them up in my tree for the next merge window, no need for you to pick
> this up in pieces.

Ok, let's queue them for 4.21 at this point. Thanks!


-Olof