From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: changbin.du@gmail.com (Changbin Du) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 09:41:12 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/mm: declare check_la57_support() as inline In-Reply-To: References: <20181028130945.23581-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20181028130945.23581-2-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20181028140911.21d49629@vmware.local.home> <20181102112728.GC14602@zn.tnic> Message-ID: <20181110010708.d3nayrzuy5d3lrkd@mail.google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 01:27:29AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:28 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:09 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 13:09:42 +0000 > > > > Changbin Du wrote: > > > > > > > > > The level4_kernel_pgt is only defined when X86_5LEVEL is enabled. > > > > > So declare check_la57_support() as inline to make sure the code > > > > > referring to level4_kernel_pgt is optimized out. This is a preparation > > > > > for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) > > > > > > > > -- Steve > > > > > > > > > > Applied to linux-kbuild. > > > > Next time, before you route a patch through your tree, please get an x86 > > maintainer's ACK first. > > > I changed my mind, and did not include this in my previous pull request > because this series is causing many warnings. > Most of the new warnings are false warnings. Since this series didn't change any code where the warnings happen. I'll make patches to make gcc happy. > Now, it is aiming for v5.0-rc1 > > So, it is not too late. > > If x86 maintainers issue Acked-by, > I am happy to add it. > > > > > > Thx. > > > > -- > > Regards/Gruss, > > Boris. > > > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada -- Thanks, Changbin Du