From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:42:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: i.MX25: add the clocks for the EPIT blocks
In-Reply-To: <20181105091230.z2ooz7olbdpopxyd@viti.kaiser.cx>
References: <1541093567-29205-1-git-send-email-martin@kaiser.cx>
 <20181104144614.GJ26016@tiger>
 <20181105091230.z2ooz7olbdpopxyd@viti.kaiser.cx>
Message-ID: <20181113144209.GB4557@dragon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thus wrote Shawn Guo (shawnguo at kernel.org):
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 06:32:47PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
> > > The i.MX25 contains two EPIT (Enhanced Periodic Interrupt Timer)
> > > function blocks. Add their ipg and per clocks to the device tree.
> 
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
> 
> > Are these EPIT devices actually used in upstream kernel, or just
> > somewhere else?
> 
> Until I saw Vladimir's mail this morning, I wasn't aware of any mainline
> driver that's using the EPIT devices. I found that the clocks are
> missing when I tried to use EPIT with a company-internal driver that's
> not suitable for mainline integration.
> 
> Still, I think that merging this patch does no harm. If the EPIT devices
> are present in the DT, we should add all resources they're using.

Agreed.  I will be happy to apply the patch if I can get an ACK from
Cl?ment saying this works with his driver in upstreaming.

Shawn