From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:33:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/9] arm64: defconfig: Drop ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ In-Reply-To: References: <898e79a6-092c-d013-d2bb-f6260e761379@free.fr> <03f41ca8-68c6-f075-cb1e-c7f630a3b128@free.fr> <20181108093617.GB8433@e107155-lin> Message-ID: <20181113173300.GA8432@e107533-lin> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 09:57:27AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > > > Commit a7314405d83c ("drop ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ support for ARM64") > > > dropped ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ support for ARM64. > > > > > > > Looks good, > > > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla > > > > But I left it intentionally to avoid churn assuming it will go away when > > ARM SoC team runs savedefconfig and sync the defconfig. > > I would never do that, instead I want patches like the one that Marc sent > in order to make sure we don't accidentally drop anything that is still > required, e.g. when an option got renamed or gained a dependency. > Thanks for the clarification. I must have misunderstood what's done in Commit c432c0880596 ("arm64: defconfig: renormalize based on recent additions") I assume it was just the reordering rather than addition/removal of entries. It's not so clear from the log message. -- Regards, Sudeep